Perception of Corrective Feedback in Pakistani ESL Universities Classroom

Afshan Shahzadi, Sadia Irshad
{"title":"Perception of Corrective Feedback in Pakistani ESL Universities Classroom","authors":"Afshan Shahzadi, Sadia Irshad","doi":"10.31703/glr.2022(vii-ii).33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scholars' findings on corrective feedback in their empirical studies show the use of written or oral corrective feedback in university classrooms. The study focuses on examining the effectiveness and learners' perception of oral O/WCF respectively in the university classroom to check to what extent written and oral OCF are used with L2 learners at the BS level and the second aim is based on learners' perceptions, which feedback is viewed more effective and why? Observation data were collected from the classroom. Six lessons have been observed using a structured observation checklist. For OCF teacher-learner interaction has been observed. Observational points were noted in the checklist and WCF learners' assignments have been assessed. Semi-Structured interviews were conducted to know the perceptions of the learners. The study employed a Mixed Method Research approach with a pragmatism paradigm. The findings of this study show, teachers use OCF more compare to WCF. Learners found WCF more effective than OCF.","PeriodicalId":365110,"journal":{"name":"Global Language Review","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Language Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2022(vii-ii).33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scholars' findings on corrective feedback in their empirical studies show the use of written or oral corrective feedback in university classrooms. The study focuses on examining the effectiveness and learners' perception of oral O/WCF respectively in the university classroom to check to what extent written and oral OCF are used with L2 learners at the BS level and the second aim is based on learners' perceptions, which feedback is viewed more effective and why? Observation data were collected from the classroom. Six lessons have been observed using a structured observation checklist. For OCF teacher-learner interaction has been observed. Observational points were noted in the checklist and WCF learners' assignments have been assessed. Semi-Structured interviews were conducted to know the perceptions of the learners. The study employed a Mixed Method Research approach with a pragmatism paradigm. The findings of this study show, teachers use OCF more compare to WCF. Learners found WCF more effective than OCF.
巴基斯坦大学英语课堂中纠正性反馈的感知
学者们在实证研究中对纠正性反馈的发现表明,在大学课堂中,书面或口头纠正性反馈的使用。该研究的重点是在大学课堂上分别检查口头OCF和口头OCF的有效性和学习者的感知,以检查BS水平的第二语言学习者使用书面OCF和口头OCF的程度。第二个目标是基于学习者的感知,哪种反馈被认为更有效,为什么?观察数据是在教室里收集的。使用结构化观察清单观察了六个课程。在OCF中,我们观察到了师生互动。在检查表中记录了观察点,并对WCF学习者的作业进行了评估。进行半结构化访谈以了解学习者的看法。本研究采用实用主义范式的混合方法研究方法。本研究的结果显示,教师使用OCF多于使用WCF。学习者发现WCF比OCF更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信