Study on the spatial differences of measuring urbanization rate with two different statistic methods of Shandong Province

Qiuying Li, C. Fang
{"title":"Study on the spatial differences of measuring urbanization rate with two different statistic methods of Shandong Province","authors":"Qiuying Li, C. Fang","doi":"10.1109/Geoinformatics.2013.6626090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two statistical methods are frequently used to measure the urbanization rate(UR). URI measures urban populations based on urban terrain boundaries, URII measures non-agricultural population based on registered permanent residence. However, in recent years, the results based on the two different statistical methods present more and more different characteristics. This paper compared the difference of the two kinds of statistical methods to analyze the peri-urbanization in absolute level (PUAL) and peri-urbanization in relative level (PURL) in the pattern of distribution characteristics and spatial difference of county units of Shandong Province in 2010. Results showed that the figures based on the two kinds of statistical methods of urbanization rate were obvious different. URI was much higher than URII and the changing trend was similar to that of the Shandong Province. URI and URII reflected the similar patterns of regional space difference and presented a clear administrative hierarchy of spatial difference. However, the difference between the coastal and inland space was not significant. The PUAL and PURL trends were fluctuating, first rising and then falling in general for the Shandong Province. PUAL indicated the spatial difference characteristics of polarization to the high administrative hierarchy. However, PURL showed the characteristics of spatial agglomeration in different counties, but there were no significant differences in administrative hierarchy.","PeriodicalId":286908,"journal":{"name":"2013 21st International Conference on Geoinformatics","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 21st International Conference on Geoinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/Geoinformatics.2013.6626090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two statistical methods are frequently used to measure the urbanization rate(UR). URI measures urban populations based on urban terrain boundaries, URII measures non-agricultural population based on registered permanent residence. However, in recent years, the results based on the two different statistical methods present more and more different characteristics. This paper compared the difference of the two kinds of statistical methods to analyze the peri-urbanization in absolute level (PUAL) and peri-urbanization in relative level (PURL) in the pattern of distribution characteristics and spatial difference of county units of Shandong Province in 2010. Results showed that the figures based on the two kinds of statistical methods of urbanization rate were obvious different. URI was much higher than URII and the changing trend was similar to that of the Shandong Province. URI and URII reflected the similar patterns of regional space difference and presented a clear administrative hierarchy of spatial difference. However, the difference between the coastal and inland space was not significant. The PUAL and PURL trends were fluctuating, first rising and then falling in general for the Shandong Province. PUAL indicated the spatial difference characteristics of polarization to the high administrative hierarchy. However, PURL showed the characteristics of spatial agglomeration in different counties, but there were no significant differences in administrative hierarchy.
两种统计方法测算山东省城镇化率的空间差异研究
城市化率(UR)的测量常用两种统计方法。URI是根据城市地形边界测算城市人口,URI是根据户籍测算非农业人口。然而,近年来,基于两种不同统计方法的结果呈现出越来越不同的特征。本文比较了2010年山东省县域单元分布格局特征和空间差异中绝对城市化程度和相对城市化程度两种统计方法的差异。结果表明,两种统计方法得出的城镇化率数据存在明显差异。URI明显高于URI,变化趋势与山东省相似。URI和URII反映了相似的区域空间差异格局,呈现出明显的空间差异行政层次。而沿海与内陆空间差异不显著。山东省的PUAL和PURL趋势呈先上升后下降的波动趋势。PUAL表现出向高行政层次极化的空间差异特征。县域间PURL呈现空间集聚特征,但行政层级差异不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信