A brief survey of sensing for metal-based powder bed fusion additive manufacturing

B. Foster, E. Reutzel, A. Nassar, C. Dickman, B. Hall
{"title":"A brief survey of sensing for metal-based powder bed fusion additive manufacturing","authors":"B. Foster, E. Reutzel, A. Nassar, C. Dickman, B. Hall","doi":"10.1117/12.2180654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – Powder bed fusion additive manufacturing (PBFAM) of metal components has attracted much attention, but the inability to quickly and easily ensure quality has limited its industrial use. Since the technology is currently being investigated for critical engineered components and is largely considered unsuitable for high volume production, traditional statistical quality control methods cannot be readily applied. An alternative strategy for quality control is to monitor the build in real time with a variety of sensing methods and, when possible, to correct any defects as they occur. This article reviews the cause of common defects in powder bed additive manufacturing, briefly surveys process monitoring strategies in the literature, and summarizes recently-developed strategies to monitor part quality during the build process. Design/methodology/approach – Factors that affect part quality in powder bed additive manufacturing are categorized as those influenced by machine variables and those affected by other build attributes. Within each category, multiple process monitoring methods are presented. Findings – A multitude of factors contribute to the overall quality of a part built using PBFAM. Rather than limiting processing to a pre-defined build recipe and assuming complete repeatability, part quality will be ensured by monitoring the process as it occurs and, when possible, altering the process conditions or build plan in real-time. Recent work shows promise in this area and brings us closer to the goal of wide-spread adoption of additive manufacturing technology. Originality/value - This work serves to introduce and define the possible sources of defects and errors in metal-based PBFAM, and surveys sensing and control methods which have recently been investigated to increase overall part quality. Emphasis has been placed on novel developments in the field and their contribution to the understanding of the additive manufacturing process.","PeriodicalId":438348,"journal":{"name":"Sensing Technologies + Applications","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sensing Technologies + Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2180654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Purpose – Powder bed fusion additive manufacturing (PBFAM) of metal components has attracted much attention, but the inability to quickly and easily ensure quality has limited its industrial use. Since the technology is currently being investigated for critical engineered components and is largely considered unsuitable for high volume production, traditional statistical quality control methods cannot be readily applied. An alternative strategy for quality control is to monitor the build in real time with a variety of sensing methods and, when possible, to correct any defects as they occur. This article reviews the cause of common defects in powder bed additive manufacturing, briefly surveys process monitoring strategies in the literature, and summarizes recently-developed strategies to monitor part quality during the build process. Design/methodology/approach – Factors that affect part quality in powder bed additive manufacturing are categorized as those influenced by machine variables and those affected by other build attributes. Within each category, multiple process monitoring methods are presented. Findings – A multitude of factors contribute to the overall quality of a part built using PBFAM. Rather than limiting processing to a pre-defined build recipe and assuming complete repeatability, part quality will be ensured by monitoring the process as it occurs and, when possible, altering the process conditions or build plan in real-time. Recent work shows promise in this area and brings us closer to the goal of wide-spread adoption of additive manufacturing technology. Originality/value - This work serves to introduce and define the possible sources of defects and errors in metal-based PBFAM, and surveys sensing and control methods which have recently been investigated to increase overall part quality. Emphasis has been placed on novel developments in the field and their contribution to the understanding of the additive manufacturing process.
金属基粉末床熔融增材制造传感技术综述
金属部件的粉末床熔融增材制造(pbam)引起了人们的广泛关注,但无法快速、轻松地保证质量限制了其工业应用。由于该技术目前正在对关键工程部件进行研究,并且在很大程度上被认为不适合大批量生产,因此传统的统计质量控制方法无法轻易应用。质量控制的另一种策略是使用各种传感方法实时监视构建,并在可能的情况下,在出现缺陷时纠正它们。本文回顾了粉末床增材制造中常见缺陷的原因,简要调查了文献中的过程监控策略,并总结了最近开发的在制造过程中监控零件质量的策略。设计/方法/方法——粉末床增材制造中影响零件质量的因素分为受机器变量影响的因素和受其他构建属性影响的因素。在每个类别中,提出了多种过程监控方法。发现-使用pfam构建的零件的整体质量受到许多因素的影响。不是将加工限制在预定义的构建配方中,并假设完全可重复,而是通过在过程发生时监视过程,并在可能的情况下实时更改过程条件或构建计划来确保零件质量。最近的工作显示了这一领域的前景,并使我们更接近广泛采用增材制造技术的目标。原创性/价值-本工作旨在介绍和定义金属基pfam中缺陷和错误的可能来源,并调查最近研究的传感和控制方法,以提高整体零件质量。重点放在该领域的新发展及其对增材制造过程理解的贡献上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书