Constituency Size and Support for Trade Liberalization: An Analysis of Foreign Economic Policy Preferences in Congress

Sean D. Ehrlich
{"title":"Constituency Size and Support for Trade Liberalization: An Analysis of Foreign Economic Policy Preferences in Congress","authors":"Sean D. Ehrlich","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1085593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies of the political economy of trade frequently rely on the assumption that the larger a policy-maker's constituency, the more supportive of free trade that policymaker will be. Large constituencies are supposed to yield concern for the national interest and provide insulation from particularistic, protectionist interests. This assumption, though, has rarely been directly tested. This article does so by leveraging the variation in district size within the U.S. Congress. This article statistically examines a data-set of roll-call votes on trade legislation from 1994 to the 2004 to determine the effect of constituency size and alternative explanations for legislative preferences on foreign economic policy and finds no evidence of the effect of constituency size.","PeriodicalId":125020,"journal":{"name":"Political Institutions: Legislatures eJournal","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Institutions: Legislatures eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1085593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Studies of the political economy of trade frequently rely on the assumption that the larger a policy-maker's constituency, the more supportive of free trade that policymaker will be. Large constituencies are supposed to yield concern for the national interest and provide insulation from particularistic, protectionist interests. This assumption, though, has rarely been directly tested. This article does so by leveraging the variation in district size within the U.S. Congress. This article statistically examines a data-set of roll-call votes on trade legislation from 1994 to the 2004 to determine the effect of constituency size and alternative explanations for legislative preferences on foreign economic policy and finds no evidence of the effect of constituency size.
选区规模与对贸易自由化的支持:国会对外经济政策偏好的分析
贸易政治经济学的研究经常依赖于这样的假设:决策者的选民越多,他们就越支持自由贸易。大选区本应产生对国家利益的关注,并与特殊的、保护主义的利益隔离开来。然而,这种假设很少得到直接验证。本文通过利用美国国会内地区规模的变化来做到这一点。本文对1994年至2004年贸易立法唱名投票的数据集进行了统计分析,以确定选区规模的影响以及立法偏好对对外经济政策的其他解释,但没有发现选区规模影响的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信