{"title":"Did God create fossils? Notes on the history of an idea","authors":"A. Khramov","doi":"10.15382/sturi2022104.29-45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of the paper is prochronism, e.g. the teaching which says that the world was created with the appearance of old age. It is shown that the sources of prochronism could be traced to the medieval doctrine of double truth and philosophy of Descartes, who suggested that cosmological theories on the origin of the Universe are purely conditional, while in fact the world was instantly created complete and mature. The idea of apparent, but non-existent past gained much credence during the first half of the 19th century, when paleontological and geological discoveries raised a question on how to square the age of the Earth and the life on it with the six days of Genesis. The hypothesis of prochronism was most fully developed in «Omphalos: an attempt to untie the geological knot» (1857), the book by the English naturalist P. Gosse. During the Darwinian time the interest in this doctrine was shown not only by Christian thinkers, but also by secular philosophers and science fiction writers. Elements of prochronism were also present in the writings of Scriptural geologists in the 19th century and their successors, the young earth creationists in the 20th century. The main objections against prochronism are critically considered. According to the most popular of them, if God had made the world appear older that it is, He thus would have deceived people. But from the point of view of prochronism, the creation of traces of never existed past was necessitated by the logic of causality, which required God to actualize all the consequences of historical epochs skipped by Him. The link between prochronism and the problem of pre-human sufferings is outlined. The conclusion is made that this doctrine, despite being counter-intuitive and rather notorious, is intellectually consistent and immune to the criticism.","PeriodicalId":407912,"journal":{"name":"St. Tikhons' University Review","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"St. Tikhons' University Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15382/sturi2022104.29-45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The subject of the paper is prochronism, e.g. the teaching which says that the world was created with the appearance of old age. It is shown that the sources of prochronism could be traced to the medieval doctrine of double truth and philosophy of Descartes, who suggested that cosmological theories on the origin of the Universe are purely conditional, while in fact the world was instantly created complete and mature. The idea of apparent, but non-existent past gained much credence during the first half of the 19th century, when paleontological and geological discoveries raised a question on how to square the age of the Earth and the life on it with the six days of Genesis. The hypothesis of prochronism was most fully developed in «Omphalos: an attempt to untie the geological knot» (1857), the book by the English naturalist P. Gosse. During the Darwinian time the interest in this doctrine was shown not only by Christian thinkers, but also by secular philosophers and science fiction writers. Elements of prochronism were also present in the writings of Scriptural geologists in the 19th century and their successors, the young earth creationists in the 20th century. The main objections against prochronism are critically considered. According to the most popular of them, if God had made the world appear older that it is, He thus would have deceived people. But from the point of view of prochronism, the creation of traces of never existed past was necessitated by the logic of causality, which required God to actualize all the consequences of historical epochs skipped by Him. The link between prochronism and the problem of pre-human sufferings is outlined. The conclusion is made that this doctrine, despite being counter-intuitive and rather notorious, is intellectually consistent and immune to the criticism.
这篇论文的主题是时间论,例如说世界是随着老年的出现而创造的教义。它表明,时间的来源可以追溯到中世纪的双重真理学说和笛卡尔的哲学,他认为宇宙起源的宇宙学理论是纯粹有条件的,而事实上,世界是瞬间创造的完整和成熟。在19世纪上半叶,当古生物学和地质学的发现提出了一个问题,即如何将地球的年龄和地球上的生命与《创世纪》的6天相吻合时,这种明显但不存在的过去的观点得到了广泛的认同。在1857年英国博物学家P. Gosse所著的《Omphalos: an attempt to解开地质结》一书中,时间性假说得到了最充分的发展。在达尔文时代,对这一学说感兴趣的不仅是基督教思想家,还有世俗哲学家和科幻作家。在19世纪的圣经地质学家及其后继者,即20世纪年轻的地球创造论者的著作中,也出现了时间的元素。对慢时性的主要反对意见被批判性地考虑。根据其中最流行的说法,如果上帝让世界看起来比它更古老,那么他就会欺骗人们。但从时间论的观点来看,创造从未存在过的过去的痕迹是因果逻辑的必然要求,这要求上帝实现他所跳过的历史时代的一切后果。本文概述了时序性与前人类苦难问题之间的联系。结论是,这一学说,尽管是反直觉的,相当臭名昭著,是理智上一致的,不受批评。