Changes in Basic Amenities, Awareness, Socio-Economy and Child Morbidity: A Comparative Study from NFHS-2 and NFHS-3

S. Bharati, M. Pal, M. Mitra, P. Bharati
{"title":"Changes in Basic Amenities, Awareness, Socio-Economy and Child Morbidity: A Comparative Study from NFHS-2 and NFHS-3","authors":"S. Bharati, M. Pal, M. Mitra, P. Bharati","doi":"10.5958/0975-6884.2016.00005.0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study presents the differentials and determinants of morbidity prevalence in India, Central India, Madhya Pradesh (MP) and Chhattisgarh. The major objectives of the study are to assess the condition of basic amenities, awareness, socio-economy and 0–59 month children's morbidity during two periods and its changes in India, Central India and two states of Central India-MP and Chhattisgarh, and also to assess the important factors which are responsible for changing the morbidity pattern among the children. For this study, national level data of two periods that is National Family Health Survey (NFHS)-2 and NFHS-3 have been used. The sample sizes used in NFHS-2 are 30, 970 for India, 6, 608 for Central India and 2, 631 for MP. In NFHS-3, the sample sizes are 48, 656 for India, 10, 750 for Central India, 2, 801 for MP and 1, 471 for Chhattisgarh. Morbidity status has been judged through diarrhoea, cough and fever. It is seen from our study that, at present, occurrences of morbidity is more or less same in India, Central India, MP and Chhattisgarh, and the changes are more or less in same magnitude from its previous time period. A very peculiar observation is that, in India, morbidity rate is high in rural areas than in urban areas, but in Central India, MP and Chhattisgarh, the picture is completely reverse that is in urban areas, morbidity is higher than in rural areas and among the illiterate persons, morbidity is the lowest. The probable reason of this may be that, the morbidity status has been judged from self-reporting method. If the reporter is not properly aware about the condition of illness, how can he or she will be able to judge the level of illness correctly; i.e. why, due to the differences in understanding, the reported morbidity differs. In general, it can be said that morbidity depends on socioeconomy, awareness and basic development strategies of the community and the individuals.","PeriodicalId":227852,"journal":{"name":"The Asian Man - An International Journal","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Asian Man - An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-6884.2016.00005.0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study presents the differentials and determinants of morbidity prevalence in India, Central India, Madhya Pradesh (MP) and Chhattisgarh. The major objectives of the study are to assess the condition of basic amenities, awareness, socio-economy and 0–59 month children's morbidity during two periods and its changes in India, Central India and two states of Central India-MP and Chhattisgarh, and also to assess the important factors which are responsible for changing the morbidity pattern among the children. For this study, national level data of two periods that is National Family Health Survey (NFHS)-2 and NFHS-3 have been used. The sample sizes used in NFHS-2 are 30, 970 for India, 6, 608 for Central India and 2, 631 for MP. In NFHS-3, the sample sizes are 48, 656 for India, 10, 750 for Central India, 2, 801 for MP and 1, 471 for Chhattisgarh. Morbidity status has been judged through diarrhoea, cough and fever. It is seen from our study that, at present, occurrences of morbidity is more or less same in India, Central India, MP and Chhattisgarh, and the changes are more or less in same magnitude from its previous time period. A very peculiar observation is that, in India, morbidity rate is high in rural areas than in urban areas, but in Central India, MP and Chhattisgarh, the picture is completely reverse that is in urban areas, morbidity is higher than in rural areas and among the illiterate persons, morbidity is the lowest. The probable reason of this may be that, the morbidity status has been judged from self-reporting method. If the reporter is not properly aware about the condition of illness, how can he or she will be able to judge the level of illness correctly; i.e. why, due to the differences in understanding, the reported morbidity differs. In general, it can be said that morbidity depends on socioeconomy, awareness and basic development strategies of the community and the individuals.
基础设施、意识、社会经济和儿童发病率的变化:来自NFHS-2和NFHS-3的比较研究
该研究介绍了印度、印度中部、中央邦和恰蒂斯加尔邦发病率的差异和决定因素。该研究的主要目的是评估基本设施,意识,社会经济和0-59个月儿童发病率在两个时期的状况及其变化,在印度,印度中部和印度中部的两个邦,mp和恰蒂斯加尔邦,也评估重要因素负责改变儿童发病率模式。本研究采用了国家家庭健康调查(NFHS)-2和NFHS-3两个时期的国家级数据。NFHS-2使用的样本量为印度30,970,印度中部6,608,中央邦2,631。在NFHS-3中,印度的样本量为48,656,印度中部为10,750,中央邦为2,801,恰蒂斯加尔邦为1,471。通过腹泻、咳嗽和发烧来判断发病情况。从我们的研究中可以看出,目前,印度、印度中部、中央邦和恰蒂斯加尔邦的发病率大致相同,变化幅度与前一时期大致相同。一个非常奇怪的观察是,在印度,农村地区的发病率比城市地区高,但在印度中部,中央邦和恰蒂斯加尔邦,情况完全相反,在城市地区,发病率比农村地区高,在文盲人群中,发病率最低。其原因可能是采用自报告法判断发病情况。如果记者没有正确地了解病情,他或她将如何能够正确地判断疾病的程度;即,为什么由于认识的不同,报告的发病率不同。总的来说,可以说发病率取决于社会经济、意识以及社区和个人的基本发展策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信