Are you being served? Embracing servant leadership, trusting library staff, and engendering change

Yvonne Nalani Meulemans, Talitha R. Matlin
{"title":"Are you being served? Embracing servant leadership, trusting library staff, and engendering change","authors":"Yvonne Nalani Meulemans, Talitha R. Matlin","doi":"10.5860/llm.v34i1.7399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is self-evident that academic libraries and librarianship are changing in substantive ways, ranging from the types of material we collect, the way we approach information literacy instruction, to our positions within college and university organizational charts. In response to a rapidly changing environment, library administrators may try to quickly bring about changes in library policies, structure, and more. However, in the process, library administrators may inadvertently adopt rigid top-down approaches that can disenfranchise and disengage library workers, resulting in outcomes that serve neither students or workers. A servant leadership approach to authority and influence may be a means to reverse this frustrating trajectory. Servant leadership requires that administrators focus on the existing expertise and the development potential of library workers as the means for ensuring fulfillment of the library’s mission in an environment of constant change. Furthermore, this approach requires administrators to begin by accepting library workers’ perspectives as their reality, instead of dismissing those perspectives. This approach shares the same foundations of two central practices of librarianship: reference and instruction. Librarians must believe users’ information needs, listen to their experiences and with this information, consider ways to aid the user in progressing toward their goal. A challenge to this approach is that it requires more work for library administrators and library workers through consideration of different types of information and looking closely at voices of disagreement and resistance. While servant leadership appears more complex with slower progress, the end result of sincere engagement and effort by everyone in the library has the potential to aid in achieving the changes needed to keep academic libraries thriving.","PeriodicalId":404822,"journal":{"name":"Library Leadership & Management","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Library Leadership & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/llm.v34i1.7399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

It is self-evident that academic libraries and librarianship are changing in substantive ways, ranging from the types of material we collect, the way we approach information literacy instruction, to our positions within college and university organizational charts. In response to a rapidly changing environment, library administrators may try to quickly bring about changes in library policies, structure, and more. However, in the process, library administrators may inadvertently adopt rigid top-down approaches that can disenfranchise and disengage library workers, resulting in outcomes that serve neither students or workers. A servant leadership approach to authority and influence may be a means to reverse this frustrating trajectory. Servant leadership requires that administrators focus on the existing expertise and the development potential of library workers as the means for ensuring fulfillment of the library’s mission in an environment of constant change. Furthermore, this approach requires administrators to begin by accepting library workers’ perspectives as their reality, instead of dismissing those perspectives. This approach shares the same foundations of two central practices of librarianship: reference and instruction. Librarians must believe users’ information needs, listen to their experiences and with this information, consider ways to aid the user in progressing toward their goal. A challenge to this approach is that it requires more work for library administrators and library workers through consideration of different types of information and looking closely at voices of disagreement and resistance. While servant leadership appears more complex with slower progress, the end result of sincere engagement and effort by everyone in the library has the potential to aid in achieving the changes needed to keep academic libraries thriving.
有人为您服务吗?拥抱仆人式领导,信任图书馆员工,推动变革
不言而喻,学术图书馆和图书馆事业正在发生实质性的变化,从我们收集的材料类型,我们处理信息素养教学的方式,到我们在学院和大学组织图表中的位置。为了应对快速变化的环境,图书馆管理员可能会尝试快速改变图书馆的政策、结构等。然而,在这个过程中,图书馆管理者可能会无意中采取严格的自上而下的方法,剥夺图书馆工作人员的权利和参与,导致对学生和工作人员都没有好处的结果。仆人式领导的权威和影响力可能是扭转这种令人沮丧的轨迹的一种手段。服务型领导要求管理者关注现有的专业知识和图书馆工作人员的发展潜力,以此作为确保图书馆在不断变化的环境中履行使命的手段。此外,这种方法要求管理者首先接受图书馆工作人员的观点作为他们的现实,而不是忽视这些观点。这种方法与图书馆工作的两个核心实践有相同的基础:参考和指导。图书馆员必须相信用户的信息需求,倾听他们的经验,利用这些信息,考虑如何帮助用户实现他们的目标。这种方法的一个挑战是,它需要图书馆管理员和图书馆工作人员通过考虑不同类型的信息和密切关注不同意见和阻力的声音来做更多的工作。虽然仆人式领导似乎更复杂,进展也更缓慢,但图书馆每个人真诚参与和努力的最终结果,有可能帮助实现保持学术图书馆蓬勃发展所需的变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信