Effect of probe coupling on MOSFET series resistance extraction up to 110 GHz

L. Nyssens, M. Rack, D. Lederer, J. Raskin
{"title":"Effect of probe coupling on MOSFET series resistance extraction up to 110 GHz","authors":"L. Nyssens, M. Rack, D. Lederer, J. Raskin","doi":"10.1109/LAEDC54796.2022.9908195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The measurement of series extrinsic resistances of MOSFETs is not straightforward and the gate resistance (Rg) in particular is very sensitive to noise measurement and measurement inaccuracies. They are critical elements that need an accurate estimation for proper FET modeling and RF figures of merit assessment, as they limit the extrinsic cutoff and maximum oscillation frequencies (ft, fmax) in deeply scaled CMOS technologies. This work compares the extrinsic resistances extraction with different off-wafer and on-wafer calibration and de-embedding methods to provide an insight on the appropriate procedure for accurate correction. Then, measurements obtained with three different probe technologies are compared. A resonance-like signature specific to each probe technology is observed, caused by unwanted coupling between the probe and the on-chip neighbor environment of the test structures. This coupling is not well corrected by the calibration and de-embedding procedure and is reflected back on the corrected measurements, mainly on the fmax and Rg curves. Overall, the best probe technology for DC-110 GHz measurements among the probes tested in this work is identified to be Picoprobe, featuring a gate resistance extraction with less than ±3% variation from 10 to 60 GHz.","PeriodicalId":276855,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE Latin American Electron Devices Conference (LAEDC)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE Latin American Electron Devices Conference (LAEDC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LAEDC54796.2022.9908195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The measurement of series extrinsic resistances of MOSFETs is not straightforward and the gate resistance (Rg) in particular is very sensitive to noise measurement and measurement inaccuracies. They are critical elements that need an accurate estimation for proper FET modeling and RF figures of merit assessment, as they limit the extrinsic cutoff and maximum oscillation frequencies (ft, fmax) in deeply scaled CMOS technologies. This work compares the extrinsic resistances extraction with different off-wafer and on-wafer calibration and de-embedding methods to provide an insight on the appropriate procedure for accurate correction. Then, measurements obtained with three different probe technologies are compared. A resonance-like signature specific to each probe technology is observed, caused by unwanted coupling between the probe and the on-chip neighbor environment of the test structures. This coupling is not well corrected by the calibration and de-embedding procedure and is reflected back on the corrected measurements, mainly on the fmax and Rg curves. Overall, the best probe technology for DC-110 GHz measurements among the probes tested in this work is identified to be Picoprobe, featuring a gate resistance extraction with less than ±3% variation from 10 to 60 GHz.
探头耦合对110 GHz频率下MOSFET串联电阻提取的影响
mosfet串联外源电阻的测量并不简单,特别是栅极电阻(Rg)对噪声测量和测量误差非常敏感。由于它们限制了深度缩放CMOS技术的外部截止和最大振荡频率(ft, fmax),因此它们是需要准确估计的关键因素,以便进行适当的场效应管建模和射频性能评估。本工作比较了不同的晶圆外和晶圆内校准和去嵌入方法的外部电阻提取,以提供准确校正的适当程序的见解。然后,比较了三种不同探针技术的测量结果。观察到每种探针技术特有的类似共振的特征,这是由探针与测试结构的片上邻近环境之间不必要的耦合引起的。这种耦合不能通过校准和去嵌入过程很好地纠正,并反映在校正后的测量上,主要是在fmax和Rg曲线上。总体而言,在本工作测试的探头中,用于DC-110 GHz测量的最佳探头技术被确定为Picoprobe,其栅极电阻提取在10至60 GHz范围内的变化小于±3%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信