Behavioral Patterns of Placement of CIN (Children In Need) and Regular Students in Inclusive Classes Learning

Diah Rizki Nur Kalifah, Aninditya Sri Nugraheni
{"title":"Behavioral Patterns of Placement of CIN (Children In Need) and Regular Students in Inclusive Classes Learning","authors":"Diah Rizki Nur Kalifah, Aninditya Sri Nugraheni","doi":"10.14421/al-athfal.2022.81-06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – In one school institution, there is two formal education consisting of CIN and regular students so that social inequality does not occur, and the same pattern of behavior is applied without distinguishing students’ shortcomings. This study aimed to analyze the behavior patterns of placement of students with special needs and regular students in learning in inclusive classes.Design/methods/approach – The method used in this research is the qualitative method of the Miles and Huberman case study. The population and sample in this study were 8 grade IV elementary school teachers, while the sampling technique was carried out using the proportional sampling method. The types of research data are primary and secondary, while the research data collection techniques are carried out by observation, interviews, and recording methods. The research stages include data reduction; data analysis starts from teacher planning in learning, evaluation of learning in inclusive classes, as well as teacher behavior patterns during the learning process for students with special needs and regular students; data verification or conclusions are drawn by reporting the results of the analysis.Findings – The research findings prove that the behavior to not differentiate between CIN and regular students is to use group learning methods consisting of CIN and regular students and to instill character education in CIN students, and through a motivational approach that strengthens the confidence of CIN students to partner with regular students.Research implications/limitations – This study was limited to where inclusive schools must prepare everything, be it teachers, students, or learning tools. Practical implications – Pattern behavior placement CIN and regular students in learning same without distinguishing and see the social status, physical, and intellectual intelligence. The differences are not in behavior patterns but learning tools such as syllabi, lesson plans, and exam questions. Teachers and students have stable values and a sense of tolerance for the differences and drawbacks of CIN students.Originality/value – In one class with special and regular students, learning activities are only in inclusive schools but in formal, informal, and non-formal schools. \nPaper type Case study","PeriodicalId":244892,"journal":{"name":"Al-Athfal: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Athfal: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14421/al-athfal.2022.81-06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose – In one school institution, there is two formal education consisting of CIN and regular students so that social inequality does not occur, and the same pattern of behavior is applied without distinguishing students’ shortcomings. This study aimed to analyze the behavior patterns of placement of students with special needs and regular students in learning in inclusive classes.Design/methods/approach – The method used in this research is the qualitative method of the Miles and Huberman case study. The population and sample in this study were 8 grade IV elementary school teachers, while the sampling technique was carried out using the proportional sampling method. The types of research data are primary and secondary, while the research data collection techniques are carried out by observation, interviews, and recording methods. The research stages include data reduction; data analysis starts from teacher planning in learning, evaluation of learning in inclusive classes, as well as teacher behavior patterns during the learning process for students with special needs and regular students; data verification or conclusions are drawn by reporting the results of the analysis.Findings – The research findings prove that the behavior to not differentiate between CIN and regular students is to use group learning methods consisting of CIN and regular students and to instill character education in CIN students, and through a motivational approach that strengthens the confidence of CIN students to partner with regular students.Research implications/limitations – This study was limited to where inclusive schools must prepare everything, be it teachers, students, or learning tools. Practical implications – Pattern behavior placement CIN and regular students in learning same without distinguishing and see the social status, physical, and intellectual intelligence. The differences are not in behavior patterns but learning tools such as syllabi, lesson plans, and exam questions. Teachers and students have stable values and a sense of tolerance for the differences and drawbacks of CIN students.Originality/value – In one class with special and regular students, learning activities are only in inclusive schools but in formal, informal, and non-formal schools. Paper type Case study
有需要儿童与普通学生在全纳班学习中的安置行为模式
目的-在一个学校机构中,有两种正规教育,包括非全日制学生和普通学生,这样就不会出现社会不平等,并且在不区分学生缺点的情况下采用相同的行为模式。本研究旨在分析特殊需要学生与普通学生在全纳班学习中的安置行为模式。设计/方法/方法-本研究中使用的方法是迈尔斯和休伯曼案例研究的定性方法。本研究的总体和样本为8名小学四年级教师,抽样技术采用比例抽样方法。研究数据的类型分为一手数据和二手数据,研究数据的收集技术采用观察法、访谈法和记录法。研究阶段包括数据简化;数据分析从教师的学习计划、全纳课堂的学习评价、特殊需要学生和普通学生学习过程中的教师行为模式入手;通过报告分析结果得出数据验证或结论。研究结果-研究结果证明,不区分CIN和普通学生的行为是使用由CIN和普通学生组成的小组学习方法,向CIN学生灌输品格教育,并通过激励方法增强CIN学生与普通学生合作的信心。研究意义/局限性-本研究仅限于包容性学校必须准备一切的地方,无论是教师、学生还是学习工具。实际意义-模式行为安置CIN和普通学生在学习上一样没有区别,看社会地位,身体和智力。差异不在于行为模式,而在于学习工具,如教学大纲、课程计划和考试问题。教师和学生有稳定的价值观,对CIN学生的差异和缺点有宽容的意识。原创性/价值——在一个有特殊学生和普通学生的班级中,学习活动只在包容性学校中进行,但在正式、非正式和非正规学校中进行。案例研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信