Residence and Citizenship by Investment: an updated database on Immigrant Investor Programs (2021)

Leila Adim
{"title":"Residence and Citizenship by Investment: an updated database on Immigrant Investor Programs (2021)","authors":"Leila Adim","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3914350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last decades, many countries have chosen to implement Immigrant Investor Programs (IIPs) to attract foreign capital and boost national economies. IIPs are based on a conditional exchange logic according to which the host country offers residence permits (Residence by Investment — RBI—), citizenship (Citizenship by Investment —CBI—) and, sometimes, preferential tax regimes, to third-country nationals making substantial investments within its territory. The influence of this kind of economic strategies on in —and out— migration of individuals and capitals leads the polarization of both immigrants and states. IIPs, in fact, tend to reveal the existence of a lucky class of immigrants, able to invest in order to skip the standard procedures for obtaining residence permits and/or citizenship, and to show that the provision of preferential treatments is apt to turn states into “top destinations”. Such a polarization does not arise from the willingness to damage a group of immigrants or from attempts to undermine the economy of other countries; by implementing IIPs, host countries pursue economic benefits without minding on any detrimental consequence. IIPs can generate discrimination between high and low-income people —immigrants and citizens—, unfair economic competition among countries, and also mismatches in the field of taxation. All these negative impacts have been widely addressed in the past1 , but they still exist and to fight them, it is important to keep the information related to RBIs and the CBIs always updated. This paper provides a database of these programs and their main characteristics2 with the aim to facilitate the work of all those researchers and organizations that commit themselves to the study of the factors that give rise to economic discrimination and unfair competition.","PeriodicalId":126589,"journal":{"name":"Macroeconomics: Production & Investment eJournal","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Macroeconomics: Production & Investment eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3914350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the last decades, many countries have chosen to implement Immigrant Investor Programs (IIPs) to attract foreign capital and boost national economies. IIPs are based on a conditional exchange logic according to which the host country offers residence permits (Residence by Investment — RBI—), citizenship (Citizenship by Investment —CBI—) and, sometimes, preferential tax regimes, to third-country nationals making substantial investments within its territory. The influence of this kind of economic strategies on in —and out— migration of individuals and capitals leads the polarization of both immigrants and states. IIPs, in fact, tend to reveal the existence of a lucky class of immigrants, able to invest in order to skip the standard procedures for obtaining residence permits and/or citizenship, and to show that the provision of preferential treatments is apt to turn states into “top destinations”. Such a polarization does not arise from the willingness to damage a group of immigrants or from attempts to undermine the economy of other countries; by implementing IIPs, host countries pursue economic benefits without minding on any detrimental consequence. IIPs can generate discrimination between high and low-income people —immigrants and citizens—, unfair economic competition among countries, and also mismatches in the field of taxation. All these negative impacts have been widely addressed in the past1 , but they still exist and to fight them, it is important to keep the information related to RBIs and the CBIs always updated. This paper provides a database of these programs and their main characteristics2 with the aim to facilitate the work of all those researchers and organizations that commit themselves to the study of the factors that give rise to economic discrimination and unfair competition.
投资居留和公民身份:投资移民项目更新数据库(2021年)
在过去的几十年里,许多国家选择实施投资移民计划(iip)来吸引外国资本和促进国民经济。iip基于有条件的交换逻辑,根据该逻辑,东道国向在其领土内进行大量投资的第三国国民提供居留许可(投资居留- RBI -),公民身份(投资公民身份- cbi -),有时还提供优惠税收制度。这种经济策略对个人和资本流入和流出的影响导致了移民和国家的两极分化。事实上,国际投资项目往往揭示了一个幸运的移民阶层的存在,他们能够通过投资来跳过获得居留许可和/或公民身份的标准程序,并表明提供优惠待遇容易使各州成为“顶级目的地”。这种两极分化不是由于愿意损害一群移民或企图破坏其他国家的经济而产生的;通过实施国际投资计划,东道国追求经济利益,而不考虑任何不利后果。国际投资协定可能造成高收入人群和低收入人群(移民和公民)之间的歧视,国家间不公平的经济竞争,以及税收领域的不匹配。所有这些负面影响在过去已经得到了广泛的解决,但它们仍然存在,为了对抗它们,重要的是要保持与央行和央行相关的信息始终更新。本文提供了一个这些程序及其主要特征的数据库,目的是方便所有致力于研究导致经济歧视和不正当竞争的因素的研究人员和组织的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信