Effect of instructor inclusion type and course complexity on students' learning in lecturer video

Jianxia Cao, A. Nishihara, Shijuan Wang
{"title":"Effect of instructor inclusion type and course complexity on students' learning in lecturer video","authors":"Jianxia Cao, A. Nishihara, Shijuan Wang","doi":"10.1145/3290511.3290544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Instructional contexts using slideshow and lecturer video are reported to be more engaging and appealing to students compared than context without instructor's video. But to which proportion instructor's inclusion should take in the instructional video still remains unknown. This study examined students' perceived instructor's presence (SPIP) and satisfaction using two types of instructor's inclusion, combining with two learning courses at different complexity levels. Explanatory Factor Analysis was done for students' perceived instructor's presence, three factors were identified, sense of connection, usefulness for clear-clarification, helpfulness for assisting-understanding. MANOVA analysis showed that there was interaction effect for students' perceived satisfaction between course complexity and the type of instructor inclusion. For bigger instructor inclusion, students' perceived instructor presence was higher for more complex learning course. For easier learning course, students' satisfaction was higher for smaller instructor inclusion. This preliminary finding provides hints for instructional video designers and facilitators.","PeriodicalId":446455,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Education Technology and Computer","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Education Technology and Computer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3290511.3290544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Instructional contexts using slideshow and lecturer video are reported to be more engaging and appealing to students compared than context without instructor's video. But to which proportion instructor's inclusion should take in the instructional video still remains unknown. This study examined students' perceived instructor's presence (SPIP) and satisfaction using two types of instructor's inclusion, combining with two learning courses at different complexity levels. Explanatory Factor Analysis was done for students' perceived instructor's presence, three factors were identified, sense of connection, usefulness for clear-clarification, helpfulness for assisting-understanding. MANOVA analysis showed that there was interaction effect for students' perceived satisfaction between course complexity and the type of instructor inclusion. For bigger instructor inclusion, students' perceived instructor presence was higher for more complex learning course. For easier learning course, students' satisfaction was higher for smaller instructor inclusion. This preliminary finding provides hints for instructional video designers and facilitators.
讲师包容类型和课程复杂性对讲师视频中学生学习的影响
据报道,与没有教师视频的教学环境相比,使用幻灯片和讲师视频的教学环境更吸引学生。但教师在教学视频中应占多大比例仍然是一个未知的问题。本研究采用两种类型的教师包容,结合两种不同复杂程度的学习课程,考察了学生对教师存在感(SPIP)和满意度。对学生感知教师在场进行解释因子分析,确定了三个因素:联系感、澄清有用性、协助理解有用性。方差分析显示,课程复杂度与教师包容类型对学生感知满意度存在交互作用。教师参与越多,学生对复杂课程的讲师在场感越高。对于较容易学习的课程,教师人数越少,学生满意度越高。这一初步发现为教学视频的设计者和辅助者提供了提示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信