Comparison of the Effectiveness of Solution-Focused Approach and Compassion-focused Therapy on Emotional Cognitive Regulation and Post-traumatic Stress Disorder in Female Head of Households

Mojgan Pourdel, Melika Sefidrood, M. Valipour, Mona Mobayeni
{"title":"Comparison of the Effectiveness of Solution-Focused Approach and Compassion-focused Therapy on Emotional Cognitive Regulation and Post-traumatic Stress Disorder in Female Head of Households","authors":"Mojgan Pourdel, Melika Sefidrood, M. Valipour, Mona Mobayeni","doi":"10.18502/qjcr.v22i85.12539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of solutionfocused approach and compassion-focused therapy on emotional cognitive regulation and post-traumatic stress disorder in female-headed households. \nMethods: The research method was quasi-experimental having pre-test and posttest with a control group. The statistical population included female-headed households who referred to the Welfare Center of Tehran province in 2021. Thirty-six female-headed households were selected through simple random sampling and randomly assigned to three groups of 12 (two experimental groups and one control group). The research instruments were Mississippi (2006) Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Scale and Garnfsky, Grich & Spinhaven (2002) Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. Participants in the experimental group received Grant’s (2011) Solution-focused counseling sessions and Gilbert’s (2010) Compassionate Therapy sessions, both for 8 sessions. In addition to descriptive statistics, analysis of covariance and Benferoni pair comparison were used to analyze the data \nFindings: The results of data analysis showed that the differences between the three groups in the variables of adaptive emotion regulation (F=30.61, P <0.001), uncompromising emotion regulation (F=22.73, P<0.001) and post-traumatic stress disorder (F=37.45, P <0.001), is significant. There is no significant difference between solution-focused therapy and compassion-focused therapy on the regulation of compromised emotion and post-traumatic stress disorder, but there is a significant difference in the noncompromised variable. \nConclusion: The findings of this study shows that solution-focused therapy and compassion-focused therapy were both effective in improving cognitive emotion regulation and stress disorder (PTSD), and of the two approaches can be used to reduce emotional regulation and post-traumatic stress disorder in female-headed Households.","PeriodicalId":203552,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Counseling Research","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Counseling Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/qjcr.v22i85.12539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of solutionfocused approach and compassion-focused therapy on emotional cognitive regulation and post-traumatic stress disorder in female-headed households. Methods: The research method was quasi-experimental having pre-test and posttest with a control group. The statistical population included female-headed households who referred to the Welfare Center of Tehran province in 2021. Thirty-six female-headed households were selected through simple random sampling and randomly assigned to three groups of 12 (two experimental groups and one control group). The research instruments were Mississippi (2006) Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Scale and Garnfsky, Grich & Spinhaven (2002) Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. Participants in the experimental group received Grant’s (2011) Solution-focused counseling sessions and Gilbert’s (2010) Compassionate Therapy sessions, both for 8 sessions. In addition to descriptive statistics, analysis of covariance and Benferoni pair comparison were used to analyze the data Findings: The results of data analysis showed that the differences between the three groups in the variables of adaptive emotion regulation (F=30.61, P <0.001), uncompromising emotion regulation (F=22.73, P<0.001) and post-traumatic stress disorder (F=37.45, P <0.001), is significant. There is no significant difference between solution-focused therapy and compassion-focused therapy on the regulation of compromised emotion and post-traumatic stress disorder, but there is a significant difference in the noncompromised variable. Conclusion: The findings of this study shows that solution-focused therapy and compassion-focused therapy were both effective in improving cognitive emotion regulation and stress disorder (PTSD), and of the two approaches can be used to reduce emotional regulation and post-traumatic stress disorder in female-headed Households.
以解决为中心与以同情为中心治疗女性户主情绪认知调节与创伤后应激障碍的效果比较
目的:比较以解决为中心的方法和以同情为中心的方法对女户主家庭情绪认知调节和创伤后应激障碍的效果。方法:采用准实验的研究方法,采用前测和后测相结合的方法,设对照组。统计人口包括2021年向德黑兰省福利中心提交的女性户主家庭。采用简单随机抽样的方法,选取36户女性户主家庭,随机分为3组,每组12人(2个实验组和1个对照组)。研究工具为Mississippi(2006)创伤后应激障碍量表和Garnfsky, Grich & Spinhaven(2002)认知情绪调节问卷。实验组的参与者接受了Grant(2011)的以解决方案为中心的咨询课程和Gilbert(2010)的富有同情心的治疗课程,都是8个疗程。数据分析结果显示,三组学生在适应性情绪调节(F=30.61, P<0.001)、不妥协情绪调节(F=22.73, P<0.001)和创伤后应激障碍(F=37.45, P<0.001)三个变量上差异均有统计学意义。以解决为中心的治疗和以同情为中心的治疗对妥协情绪和创伤后应激障碍的调节无显著差异,但在非妥协变量上有显著差异。结论:本研究结果表明,以解决为中心的治疗和以同情为中心的治疗均能有效改善女性户主家庭的认知情绪调节和应激障碍(PTSD),并可用于减少女性户主家庭的情绪调节和创伤后应激障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信