The RSI syndrome in historical perspective.

J Quintner
{"title":"The RSI syndrome in historical perspective.","authors":"J Quintner","doi":"10.3109/03790799109166692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The pain syndrome repetition strain injury (RSI) has been variously interpreted as a psychogenic disorder, an overuse injury of upper limb musculature, and a state of peripheral neural irritability. A review of the history of work-related upper limb disorders was undertaken to ascertain whether RSI is a new medical phenomenon or an older syndrome in a new guise. In the mid-nineteenth century these disorders were known as either craft palsies or writer's and other occupational cramps. Not withstanding clinical evidence suggesting that most were associated with peripheral neural or muscular dysfunction, a body of influential medical opinion considered them all to be disorders of the central nervous system, appropriately termed the occupation(al) neuroses. During the twentieth century, as discrete occupational upper limb nerve lesions were delineated and the spasmodic form of writer's cramp was recognized as a torsion dystonia, a unifying concept of aetiology for the occupational neuroses of the nineteenth century became untenable. The RSI syndrome of the 1980s can be identified from early case descriptions of both scrivener's palsy and the neuralgic variety of writer's cramp. Contemporary hypotheses proposed to explain RSI are remarkably similar to those proposed for the occupation(al) neuroses.</p>","PeriodicalId":77547,"journal":{"name":"International disability studies","volume":"13 3","pages":"99-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/03790799109166692","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International disability studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/03790799109166692","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

The pain syndrome repetition strain injury (RSI) has been variously interpreted as a psychogenic disorder, an overuse injury of upper limb musculature, and a state of peripheral neural irritability. A review of the history of work-related upper limb disorders was undertaken to ascertain whether RSI is a new medical phenomenon or an older syndrome in a new guise. In the mid-nineteenth century these disorders were known as either craft palsies or writer's and other occupational cramps. Not withstanding clinical evidence suggesting that most were associated with peripheral neural or muscular dysfunction, a body of influential medical opinion considered them all to be disorders of the central nervous system, appropriately termed the occupation(al) neuroses. During the twentieth century, as discrete occupational upper limb nerve lesions were delineated and the spasmodic form of writer's cramp was recognized as a torsion dystonia, a unifying concept of aetiology for the occupational neuroses of the nineteenth century became untenable. The RSI syndrome of the 1980s can be identified from early case descriptions of both scrivener's palsy and the neuralgic variety of writer's cramp. Contemporary hypotheses proposed to explain RSI are remarkably similar to those proposed for the occupation(al) neuroses.

从历史角度看RSI综合征。
疼痛综合征重复性劳损(RSI)被不同地解释为一种心因性障碍、上肢肌肉组织的过度使用损伤和周围神经激惹状态。回顾了与工作相关的上肢疾病的历史,以确定RSI是一种新的医学现象还是一种新的伪装的老年综合征。在19世纪中期,这些疾病被称为手工艺麻痹或作家和其他职业痉挛。尽管临床证据表明大多数与周围神经或肌肉功能障碍有关,但有影响力的医学观点认为它们都是中枢神经系统的疾病,适当地称为职业性神经症。在20世纪,随着离散的职业性上肢神经病变被描绘出来,痉挛性痉挛被认为是一种扭转性肌张力障碍,19世纪职业性神经症病因学的统一概念变得站不住脚。20世纪80年代的RSI综合征可以从早期的病例描述中识别,包括作家麻痹和作家痉挛的神经痛。当代提出的解释RSI的假说与职业神经症的假说非常相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信