Minimally Invasive Surgery is Associated with Improved Outcomes Following Urgent Inpatient Colectomy

Luv N. Hajirawala, Varun Krishnan, C. Leonardi, Elyse R. Bevier-Rawls, G. Orangio, Kurt G. Davis, Aaron L. Klinger, Jeffrey S. Barton
{"title":"Minimally Invasive Surgery is Associated with Improved Outcomes Following Urgent Inpatient Colectomy","authors":"Luv N. Hajirawala, Varun Krishnan, C. Leonardi, Elyse R. Bevier-Rawls, G. Orangio, Kurt G. Davis, Aaron L. Klinger, Jeffrey S. Barton","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2021.00075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The use of minimally invasive techniques for urgent colectomies remains understudied. This study compares short-term outcomes following urgent minimally invasive colectomies to those following open colectomies. Methods & Procedures: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) colectomy database was queried between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2018. Patients who underwent elective and emergency colectomies, based on the respective NSQIP variables, were excluded. The remaining patients were divided into two groups, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open. MIS colectomies with unplanned conversion to open were included in the MIS group. Baseline characteristics and 30-day outcomes were compared using univariable and multivariable regression analyses. Results: A total of 29,345 patients were included in the study; 12,721 (43.3%) underwent MIS colectomy, while 16,624 (56.7%) underwent open colectomy. Patients undergoing MIS colectomy were younger (60.6 vs 63.8 years) and had a lower prevalence of either American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) IV (9.9 vs 15.5%) or ASA V (0.08% vs 2%). After multivariable analysis, MIS colectomy was associated with lower odds of mortality (odds ratio = 0.75, 95% confidence interval: 0.61, 0.91 95% confidence interval), and most short-term complications recorded in the ACS NSQIP. While MIS colectomies took longer to perform (161 vs 140 min), the length of stay was shorter (12.2 vs 14.1 days). Conclusions: MIS colectomy affords better short-term complication rates and a reduced length of stay compared to open colectomy for patients requiring urgent surgery. If feasible, minimally invasive colectomy should be offered to patients necessitating urgent colon resection.","PeriodicalId":114569,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2021.00075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: The use of minimally invasive techniques for urgent colectomies remains understudied. This study compares short-term outcomes following urgent minimally invasive colectomies to those following open colectomies. Methods & Procedures: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) colectomy database was queried between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2018. Patients who underwent elective and emergency colectomies, based on the respective NSQIP variables, were excluded. The remaining patients were divided into two groups, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open. MIS colectomies with unplanned conversion to open were included in the MIS group. Baseline characteristics and 30-day outcomes were compared using univariable and multivariable regression analyses. Results: A total of 29,345 patients were included in the study; 12,721 (43.3%) underwent MIS colectomy, while 16,624 (56.7%) underwent open colectomy. Patients undergoing MIS colectomy were younger (60.6 vs 63.8 years) and had a lower prevalence of either American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) IV (9.9 vs 15.5%) or ASA V (0.08% vs 2%). After multivariable analysis, MIS colectomy was associated with lower odds of mortality (odds ratio = 0.75, 95% confidence interval: 0.61, 0.91 95% confidence interval), and most short-term complications recorded in the ACS NSQIP. While MIS colectomies took longer to perform (161 vs 140 min), the length of stay was shorter (12.2 vs 14.1 days). Conclusions: MIS colectomy affords better short-term complication rates and a reduced length of stay compared to open colectomy for patients requiring urgent surgery. If feasible, minimally invasive colectomy should be offered to patients necessitating urgent colon resection.
微创手术与急诊住院结肠切除术后预后改善相关
目的:微创技术在紧急结肠切除术中的应用仍有待进一步研究。本研究比较了紧急微创结肠切除术和开放结肠切除术后的短期疗效。方法与程序:查询2013年1月1日至2018年12月31日期间美国外科学会国家手术质量改进计划(ACS NSQIP)结肠切除术数据库。根据各自的NSQIP变量,排除了接受选择性和紧急结肠切除术的患者。其余患者分为微创手术组(MIS)和开放两组。非计划转换为开放的MIS集合包括在MIS组中。使用单变量和多变量回归分析比较基线特征和30天结果。结果:共纳入29345例患者;12721例(43.3%)行MIS结肠切除术,16624例(56.7%)行开放式结肠切除术。接受MIS结肠切除术的患者更年轻(60.6比63.8岁),并且美国麻醉学学会(ASA) IV(9.9比15.5%)或ASA V(0.08%比2%)的患病率更低。多变量分析后,MIS结肠切除术与较低的死亡率相关(优势比= 0.75,95%可信区间:0.61,95%可信区间:0.91),并且与ACS NSQIP中记录的大多数短期并发症相关。虽然MIS结肠切除术需要更长的时间(161对140分钟),但停留时间较短(12.2对14.1天)。结论:对于需要紧急手术的患者,与开放式结肠切除术相比,MIS结肠切除术具有更好的短期并发症发生率和更短的住院时间。在可行的情况下,对需要紧急结肠切除术的患者应给予微创结肠切除术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信