Re-assessment of transition justice in Southern African States: Challenges and prospects

Nelson Goldpin Obah-Akpowoghaha, Madun N. Marong, M. L. Tarro
{"title":"Re-assessment of transition justice in Southern African States: Challenges and prospects","authors":"Nelson Goldpin Obah-Akpowoghaha, Madun N. Marong, M. L. Tarro","doi":"10.5897/ajpsir2021.1379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper outlines the origin, meaning and benefits of Transitional Justice (TJ). It looks at the various mechanisms or processes used to implement transitional justice. The paper also re-assessed transitional justice in Southern African states with focus on South Africa, Mozambique, and Angola. The historical background to transitional justice in these countries is given then their various TJ mechanisms examined. These portray the strengths and shortcomings of TJ in these Southern African states. The paper is based on a literature review and secondary sources on TJ in South Africa, Mozambique, and Angola. It shows written academic works of the transitional justice mechanisms in these Southern African states. Basically, the paper is descriptive in nature and historical method or Ex-post facto is employed. The paper shows that TJ processes do not necessarily have to be Western oriented or liberalist in approach. They can be locally driven or traditionally crafted depending on the context of the country. The article argues that in South Africa, Mozambique and Angola, different approaches were employed and all had some level of success. Therefore, Africa can always use African post-conflict mechanisms, not Western, to promote peace and reconciliation on the continent.","PeriodicalId":120632,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Political Science and International Relations","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Political Science and International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5897/ajpsir2021.1379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper outlines the origin, meaning and benefits of Transitional Justice (TJ). It looks at the various mechanisms or processes used to implement transitional justice. The paper also re-assessed transitional justice in Southern African states with focus on South Africa, Mozambique, and Angola. The historical background to transitional justice in these countries is given then their various TJ mechanisms examined. These portray the strengths and shortcomings of TJ in these Southern African states. The paper is based on a literature review and secondary sources on TJ in South Africa, Mozambique, and Angola. It shows written academic works of the transitional justice mechanisms in these Southern African states. Basically, the paper is descriptive in nature and historical method or Ex-post facto is employed. The paper shows that TJ processes do not necessarily have to be Western oriented or liberalist in approach. They can be locally driven or traditionally crafted depending on the context of the country. The article argues that in South Africa, Mozambique and Angola, different approaches were employed and all had some level of success. Therefore, Africa can always use African post-conflict mechanisms, not Western, to promote peace and reconciliation on the continent.
南部非洲国家转型正义的重新评估:挑战与前景
本文概述了过渡时期司法的起源、意义和益处。它着眼于用于实施过渡时期司法的各种机制或程序。本文还重新评估了南部非洲国家的过渡时期司法,重点是南非、莫桑比克和安哥拉。这些国家的过渡时期司法的历史背景,然后他们的各种TJ机制审查。这些描述了这些南部非洲国家TJ的优点和缺点。本文基于对南非、莫桑比克和安哥拉TJ的文献综述和二手资料。它展示了这些南部非洲国家过渡时期司法机制的书面学术著作。基本上,本文是描述性的,并采用历史或事后的方法。本文表明,TJ过程不一定是西方导向或自由主义的方法。它们可以是当地驱动的,也可以是根据国家的背景传统制作的。这篇文章认为,在南非、莫桑比克和安哥拉,采用了不同的方法,都取得了一定程度的成功。因此,非洲总是可以利用非洲的冲突后机制,而不是西方的机制,来促进非洲大陆的和平与和解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信