보육교사들의 질 높은 교사-영유아 간 상호작용 수행을 위한 반성적 사고 경험에 관한 연구

S. Kim, 이민주, 이영신
{"title":"보육교사들의 질 높은 교사-영유아 간 상호작용 수행을 위한 반성적 사고 경험에 관한 연구","authors":"S. Kim, 이민주, 이영신","doi":"10.30528/jolss.2018.8.3.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to explore the various ways teachers have experienced three types of reflective thinking to form the practical knowledge needed to carry out high-quality teacher-child interactions with child care teachers who work at day care centers. For this purpose, 20 child care teachers at day care centers located in Seoul, Gyeonggi, and Daejeon were selected. Based on their career experiences, the teachers were divided into five focus groups. Interview data was analyzed after focus group interviews were conducted with these five groups. The results of this study suggest that child care teachers have used various methods to experience the three types of reflective thinking processes proposed by Killion and Todnerm (1991): reflective thinking for high-quality teacher-child interactions, reflective thinking in the practice of high-quality teacher-child interaction, and reflective thinking about high-quality teacher-child interaction. The results of this study reaffirm the results of previous research that it is necessary to make active use of interactive images to support child care teachers to have reflective thinking about the teachers-child interaction Furthermore, the need to provide several forms of reflective thinking opportunities in the growth process of child care teachers was suggested.","PeriodicalId":287302,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Life-span Studies","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Life-span Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30528/jolss.2018.8.3.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the various ways teachers have experienced three types of reflective thinking to form the practical knowledge needed to carry out high-quality teacher-child interactions with child care teachers who work at day care centers. For this purpose, 20 child care teachers at day care centers located in Seoul, Gyeonggi, and Daejeon were selected. Based on their career experiences, the teachers were divided into five focus groups. Interview data was analyzed after focus group interviews were conducted with these five groups. The results of this study suggest that child care teachers have used various methods to experience the three types of reflective thinking processes proposed by Killion and Todnerm (1991): reflective thinking for high-quality teacher-child interactions, reflective thinking in the practice of high-quality teacher-child interaction, and reflective thinking about high-quality teacher-child interaction. The results of this study reaffirm the results of previous research that it is necessary to make active use of interactive images to support child care teachers to have reflective thinking about the teachers-child interaction Furthermore, the need to provide several forms of reflective thinking opportunities in the growth process of child care teachers was suggested.
保育教师们为了提高教师与婴幼儿间的相互作用而进行的反省思考经验研究
本研究的目的是探讨教师在与日托中心的幼儿教师进行高质量的师生互动时,经历三种反思性思维的不同方式,以形成所需的实践知识。为此,在首尔、京畿、大田等地的日托所选定了20名幼儿教师。根据教师的职业经历,他们被分成五个焦点小组。对这五组进行焦点小组访谈后,对访谈数据进行分析。本研究结果表明,幼儿教师通过各种方式体验了Killion和Todnerm(1991)提出的三种反思性思维过程:高质量师生互动的反思性思维、高质量师生互动实践中的反思性思维和高质量师生互动的反思性思维。本研究的结果再次肯定了以往的研究结果,即需要积极利用互动影像来支持幼儿教师对师生互动进行反思性思考,并提出幼儿教师成长过程中需要提供多种形式的反思性思考机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信