Evaluation of Low-Contrast Resolution for Computed Tomography by Method of Optimized CNR and Experts' Subjective Evaluation

Chengwei Li, Jie Sun, Luchen Liu, Peng Zhang, Wenli Liu, Pu Zhang
{"title":"Evaluation of Low-Contrast Resolution for Computed Tomography by Method of Optimized CNR and Experts' Subjective Evaluation","authors":"Chengwei Li, Jie Sun, Luchen Liu, Peng Zhang, Wenli Liu, Pu Zhang","doi":"10.1109/CISP-BMEI48845.2019.8965951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to optimize the evaluation procedure of contrast to noise ratio (CNR) on low-contrast resolution (LCR) phantom images of computed tomography (CT). Axial CT images of phantom Catphan 600 which contained the low-contrast module CTP515 and the uniformity module CTP486 were acquired from five 64-slices spiral CT scanners with the same scanning parameters. Through conjoint analysis of images of CTP515 and CTP486, two steps of optimization were added to the evaluation procedure to get the optimized CNR results. Meanwhile, four experts were invited to perform the subjective evaluation of the same low-contrast images. With the method of normalization, results gained by optimized CNR and the experts' subjective evaluation were compared to investigate the consistency of the two evaluation methods. According to the comparison of the normalized values, the optimized CNR gained by the method of two-stage average could be used as basis to assist tester achieve similar result compared to that from experts' subjective evaluation.","PeriodicalId":257666,"journal":{"name":"2019 12th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 12th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CISP-BMEI48845.2019.8965951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to optimize the evaluation procedure of contrast to noise ratio (CNR) on low-contrast resolution (LCR) phantom images of computed tomography (CT). Axial CT images of phantom Catphan 600 which contained the low-contrast module CTP515 and the uniformity module CTP486 were acquired from five 64-slices spiral CT scanners with the same scanning parameters. Through conjoint analysis of images of CTP515 and CTP486, two steps of optimization were added to the evaluation procedure to get the optimized CNR results. Meanwhile, four experts were invited to perform the subjective evaluation of the same low-contrast images. With the method of normalization, results gained by optimized CNR and the experts' subjective evaluation were compared to investigate the consistency of the two evaluation methods. According to the comparison of the normalized values, the optimized CNR gained by the method of two-stage average could be used as basis to assist tester achieve similar result compared to that from experts' subjective evaluation.
基于优化CNR和专家主观评价的计算机断层低对比度分辨率评价
本研究旨在优化低对比度分辨率(LCR)计算机断层扫描(CT)伪像的噪比(CNR)评价方法。幻影Catphan 600轴向CT图像,包含低对比度模块CTP515和均匀性模块CTP486,来自5台64片螺旋CT扫描仪,扫描参数相同。通过对CTP515和CTP486图像的联合分析,在评价过程中增加两步优化,得到优化后的CNR结果。同时,邀请4位专家对相同的低对比度图像进行主观评价。采用归一化方法,将优化后的CNR结果与专家主观评价结果进行对比,考察两种评价方法的一致性。通过对归一化值的比较,两阶段平均法得到的优化CNR可作为辅助测试人员获得与专家主观评价相似的结果的依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信