Military cliques in the Serbian strategic culture of the 20th century

Vojno delo Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.5937/vojdelo2103088b
V. Blagojević, D. Petrović
{"title":"Military cliques in the Serbian strategic culture of the 20th century","authors":"V. Blagojević, D. Petrović","doi":"10.5937/vojdelo2103088b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Throughout the entire 20th century, the Serbian strategic culture was \"torn\" by various discontinuities, from the state system, through foreign policy and ideological, to strategic and doctrinal orientation, and it can be said that discontinuity is almost its only constant. Nevertheless, the existence of military cliques can be considered to be one of the constants of the Serbian strategic culture. They followed the Serbian Army and influenced the political life of the Kingdom of Serbia. The dynastic coup of May 1903 can be taken as an example of their actions. After that, younger conspirators established the so-called Black Hand, whose leader was Colonel Apis, who was shot after the Thessaloniki process in 1917. The interwar period was marked by the action of the so-called White Hand, under the leadership of General Petar Živković, which was active until the assassination of King Alexander Karađorđević in Marseilles in 1934. The Second Yugoslavia even had a formalized \"military clique\" represented in the League of Communists, which was an integral part of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia at federal level, together with the republican leagues. Thus, the influence of the party on the military organization was secured, and the influence of the army in the society was also \"secured\" by its representation in the party forum at federal level. Consequently, the Serbian political elite welcomed the dissolution of the SFRY with perhaps the only constant in its strategic culture, and that is the reliance on the military in resolving political crises, which can be vividly presented by the statement of Slobodan Milosević: \"We do not know how to work, but we know how to fight\".","PeriodicalId":261517,"journal":{"name":"Vojno delo","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vojno delo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/vojdelo2103088b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Throughout the entire 20th century, the Serbian strategic culture was "torn" by various discontinuities, from the state system, through foreign policy and ideological, to strategic and doctrinal orientation, and it can be said that discontinuity is almost its only constant. Nevertheless, the existence of military cliques can be considered to be one of the constants of the Serbian strategic culture. They followed the Serbian Army and influenced the political life of the Kingdom of Serbia. The dynastic coup of May 1903 can be taken as an example of their actions. After that, younger conspirators established the so-called Black Hand, whose leader was Colonel Apis, who was shot after the Thessaloniki process in 1917. The interwar period was marked by the action of the so-called White Hand, under the leadership of General Petar Živković, which was active until the assassination of King Alexander Karađorđević in Marseilles in 1934. The Second Yugoslavia even had a formalized "military clique" represented in the League of Communists, which was an integral part of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia at federal level, together with the republican leagues. Thus, the influence of the party on the military organization was secured, and the influence of the army in the society was also "secured" by its representation in the party forum at federal level. Consequently, the Serbian political elite welcomed the dissolution of the SFRY with perhaps the only constant in its strategic culture, and that is the reliance on the military in resolving political crises, which can be vividly presented by the statement of Slobodan Milosević: "We do not know how to work, but we know how to fight".
20世纪塞尔维亚战略文化中的军事派系
在整个20世纪,塞尔维亚的战略文化被各种不连续性“撕裂”,从国家制度,到外交政策和意识形态,再到战略和理论取向,可以说,不连续性几乎是其唯一不变的。然而,军事集团的存在可以被认为是塞尔维亚战略文化的一个不变因素。他们跟随塞尔维亚军队,影响了塞尔维亚王国的政治生活。一九九三年五月的王朝政变,就是他们行动的一个例子。在那之后,年轻的阴谋家建立了所谓的黑手,其领导人是阿皮斯上校,他在1917年塞萨洛尼基进程后被枪决。在两次世界大战之间的时期,所谓的“白手”在彼得将军Živković的领导下,一直活跃到1934年亚历山大国王Karađorđević在马赛被暗杀为止。第二南斯拉夫甚至有一个以共产主义者联盟为代表的正式的“军事集团”,它是南斯拉夫共产主义者联盟在联邦一级的组成部分,与共和国联盟一起。因此,党对军事组织的影响得到了保证,军队在社会中的影响也通过其在联邦一级党的论坛中的代表得到了"保证"。因此,塞尔维亚政治精英欢迎南斯拉夫联邦共和国的解散,这也许是其战略文化中唯一不变的,那就是依靠军队解决政治危机,这一点可以通过斯洛博丹·米洛舍维奇的发言生动地表现出来:“我们不知道如何工作,但我们知道如何战斗”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信