Towards the exploration of renewable energy technologies as an alternative to grid extension for rural electrification in South Africa

S. Mudziwepasi, M. Scott
{"title":"Towards the exploration of renewable energy technologies as an alternative to grid extension for rural electrification in South Africa","authors":"S. Mudziwepasi, M. Scott","doi":"10.1109/DUE.2014.6827770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the economic viability of stand-alone, household-sized renewable energy technologies, namely wind generator and solar photovoltaic (PV) for application in remote and rural areas of South Africa. Three reference technologies are chosen. These are two solar PV systems for solar conditions and one wind turbine. It is found for all regions that levelized costs of PV energy are lower than the cost of energy from gasoline gen-set, and are cost-competitive with grid extension, especially for areas with low load density and low number of households to be electrified. Regarding wind energy, the viability is dependent on the location due to the wide variation of wind resource to topography. However, in locations with proper resources, wind energy is even more cost-competitive than solar PV. Thus, the use of either wind generator or solar PV is economically feasible in rural villages and remote areas of South Africa. Policy recommendations for promoting the market development of renewable energy technologies are discussed in the final section of the paper.","PeriodicalId":112427,"journal":{"name":"Twenty-Second Domestic Use of Energy","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Twenty-Second Domestic Use of Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DUE.2014.6827770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper examines the economic viability of stand-alone, household-sized renewable energy technologies, namely wind generator and solar photovoltaic (PV) for application in remote and rural areas of South Africa. Three reference technologies are chosen. These are two solar PV systems for solar conditions and one wind turbine. It is found for all regions that levelized costs of PV energy are lower than the cost of energy from gasoline gen-set, and are cost-competitive with grid extension, especially for areas with low load density and low number of households to be electrified. Regarding wind energy, the viability is dependent on the location due to the wide variation of wind resource to topography. However, in locations with proper resources, wind energy is even more cost-competitive than solar PV. Thus, the use of either wind generator or solar PV is economically feasible in rural villages and remote areas of South Africa. Policy recommendations for promoting the market development of renewable energy technologies are discussed in the final section of the paper.
探索可再生能源技术,作为南非农村电气化电网扩展的替代方案
本文考察了独立的、家庭规模的可再生能源技术的经济可行性,即风力发电机和太阳能光伏(PV)在南非偏远和农村地区的应用。选择了三种参考技术。这是两个用于太阳能条件的太阳能光伏系统和一个风力涡轮机。研究发现,在所有地区,光伏发电的平准化成本均低于汽油发电机组的平准化成本,在电网扩展方面具有成本竞争力,特别是在负荷密度低、户数少的地区。关于风能,可行性取决于位置,因为风资源与地形有很大的差异。然而,在拥有适当资源的地区,风能甚至比太阳能光伏更具成本竞争力。因此,在南非农村和偏远地区使用风力发电机或太阳能光伏发电在经济上是可行的。本文最后一节讨论了促进可再生能源技术市场发展的政策建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信