Microfinance Impact on Household Poverty Levels

Diana Muturi
{"title":"Microfinance Impact on Household Poverty Levels","authors":"Diana Muturi","doi":"10.47604/jpid.2079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The aim of the study was to investigate Microfinance Impact on Household Poverty Levels \nMethodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. \nFindings: The study's findings highlighted that microfinance has a mixed impact on household poverty levels. While treated households experienced increased income, consumption, and investment, overall poverty reduction remained modest. Notably, the positive effects were more pronounced for households with pre-existing entrepreneurial skills. The relationship between microfinance and women's empowerment was complex, as these programs had varying impacts on income generation and decision-making among women. Furthermore, group-based microcredit programs led to improved household welfare for both genders, with females experiencing more significant poverty reductions. \nUnique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Financial Inclusion Theory and Social Capital Theory may be used to anchor future studies on Microfinance impact on household poverty levels. Offer financial literacy training and business development support to borrowers. Enforce policies that protect borrowers from predatory lending practices, ensuring transparency in loan terms and preventing coercive debt collection tactics","PeriodicalId":194383,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Poverty, Investment and Development","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Poverty, Investment and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47604/jpid.2079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to investigate Microfinance Impact on Household Poverty Levels Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: The study's findings highlighted that microfinance has a mixed impact on household poverty levels. While treated households experienced increased income, consumption, and investment, overall poverty reduction remained modest. Notably, the positive effects were more pronounced for households with pre-existing entrepreneurial skills. The relationship between microfinance and women's empowerment was complex, as these programs had varying impacts on income generation and decision-making among women. Furthermore, group-based microcredit programs led to improved household welfare for both genders, with females experiencing more significant poverty reductions. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Financial Inclusion Theory and Social Capital Theory may be used to anchor future studies on Microfinance impact on household poverty levels. Offer financial literacy training and business development support to borrowers. Enforce policies that protect borrowers from predatory lending practices, ensuring transparency in loan terms and preventing coercive debt collection tactics
小额信贷对家庭贫困水平的影响
目的:本研究的目的是调查小额信贷对家庭贫困水平的影响。方法:本研究采用桌面方法。书桌式研究设计通常被称为二次资料收集。这基本上是从现有资源中收集数据,因为与实地研究相比,它的成本较低。我们目前的研究调查了已经发表的研究和报告,因为数据很容易通过在线期刊和图书馆获取。研究结果:研究结果强调,小额信贷对家庭贫困水平的影响好坏参半。虽然接受治疗的家庭收入、消费和投资都有所增加,但总体减贫程度仍然不大。值得注意的是,对于已有创业技能的家庭,积极影响更为明显。小额信贷与妇女赋权之间的关系是复杂的,因为这些项目对妇女的创收和决策产生了不同的影响。此外,以群体为基础的小额信贷项目改善了男女家庭福利,女性的贫困率显著下降。对理论、实践和政策的独特贡献:金融普惠理论和社会资本理论可用于确定小额信贷对家庭贫困水平影响的未来研究。为借款人提供金融知识培训和业务发展支持。执行保护借款人不受掠夺性贷款行为影响的政策,确保贷款条款的透明度,防止强制收债策略
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信