“Does God sleep like us?” Diaries about children’s religiosity

T. Folieva
{"title":"“Does God sleep like us?” Diaries about children’s religiosity","authors":"T. Folieva","doi":"10.15382/sturiv202266.117-128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the diaries of mothers who monitored their children according to a clear plan, which was developed for them by the famous teacher and pedologist Nikolai Aleksandrovich Rybnikov (1880-1961). For the first time in Russian science, he suggested that the most effective is biographical research, which should be longitudinal, and documents of personal origin should serve as sources for analysis. The Diaries give us a lot of information - from descriptions of progressive women to n. XX century before the formation of the personality of the child. Pedology had its own target audience, on which it relied - intellectual circles, which were open to new trends in science. On the other hand, we see that such circles were, if not prosperous, at least quite well off. After the October Revolution, pedology lost its social and economic base; its defeat was a matter of time. If we touch directly on issues related to the history of psychology, then, undoubtedly, we have a unique document before us. Such observations allow us to reconstruct the development of children at the beginning of the 20th century and conduct a comparative analysis; he shows us the differences in the assessment of the development of children in the course of the history of psychology and pedagogy; it allows us to reconstruct the religious ideas of children at the beginning of the 20th century and to identify how they differ from modern ideas.","PeriodicalId":334788,"journal":{"name":"St. Tikhons' University Review. Series IV. Pedagogy. Psychology","volume":"92 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"St. Tikhons' University Review. Series IV. Pedagogy. Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15382/sturiv202266.117-128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article deals with the diaries of mothers who monitored their children according to a clear plan, which was developed for them by the famous teacher and pedologist Nikolai Aleksandrovich Rybnikov (1880-1961). For the first time in Russian science, he suggested that the most effective is biographical research, which should be longitudinal, and documents of personal origin should serve as sources for analysis. The Diaries give us a lot of information - from descriptions of progressive women to n. XX century before the formation of the personality of the child. Pedology had its own target audience, on which it relied - intellectual circles, which were open to new trends in science. On the other hand, we see that such circles were, if not prosperous, at least quite well off. After the October Revolution, pedology lost its social and economic base; its defeat was a matter of time. If we touch directly on issues related to the history of psychology, then, undoubtedly, we have a unique document before us. Such observations allow us to reconstruct the development of children at the beginning of the 20th century and conduct a comparative analysis; he shows us the differences in the assessment of the development of children in the course of the history of psychology and pedagogy; it allows us to reconstruct the religious ideas of children at the beginning of the 20th century and to identify how they differ from modern ideas.
“上帝和我们一样睡觉吗?”关于儿童宗教信仰的日记
这篇文章讲述了一些母亲的日记,她们按照一个明确的计划来监控自己的孩子,这个计划是由著名的教师和儿童学家尼古拉·亚历山德罗维奇·雷布尼科夫(1880-1961)为她们制定的。在俄罗斯科学中,他第一次提出最有效的是传记研究,这种研究应该是纵向的,个人出身的文件应该作为分析的来源。日记给我们提供了很多信息——从对进步女性的描述到20世纪前儿童人格的形成。土壤学有自己的目标受众,它所依赖的是知识分子圈子,他们对科学的新趋势持开放态度。另一方面,我们看到,这样的圈子,如果不繁荣,至少相当富裕。十月革命后,教育学失去了社会经济基础;它的失败只是时间问题。如果我们直接触及与心理学历史有关的问题,那么,毫无疑问,我们面前有一份独特的文件。这样的观察使我们能够重建20世纪初儿童的发展,并进行比较分析;他向我们展示了在心理学史和教育学的课程中对儿童发展的评估的差异;它使我们能够重建20世纪初儿童的宗教观念,并确定他们与现代观念的不同之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信