Children on their Participation, Nature, Competence, Rights, and Difference from Adults in the 2018 Parkland School Shooting Protests

Roberto S. Salva
{"title":"Children on their Participation, Nature, Competence, Rights, and Difference from Adults in the 2018 Parkland School Shooting Protests","authors":"Roberto S. Salva","doi":"10.1163/15718182-30040008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nUsing a “child participation research as duty fulfilment and investigation” approach, we looked into US children’s participation reasons in the 2018 Parkland shooting protests. As duty bearers, we highlight children’s protest participation reasons ground up and in vivo. Then, we explore these reasons for children’s views on the four key issues hounding children’s rights. Using 326 randomly selected US middle and high school newsletters, we found ten significant themes substantively different from but logically linked with organisers’ publicised objectives. The reasons indicate children’s internalisation, a source of autonomy development, of the issues surrounding the shooting and protests. They reveal children’s views on the four key issues that emphasise the need to consider more the convergent and in-between of the mutually exclusive categories in childhood/child rights studies. Future studies should consider treating the being/becoming, nurturance/self-determination rights, and similar, convergent, and in-between categories in dynamic logical disjunctive relations. Our approach and similar child participation research approaches could also be further developed and used.","PeriodicalId":217193,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Children’s Rights","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Children’s Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-30040008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using a “child participation research as duty fulfilment and investigation” approach, we looked into US children’s participation reasons in the 2018 Parkland shooting protests. As duty bearers, we highlight children’s protest participation reasons ground up and in vivo. Then, we explore these reasons for children’s views on the four key issues hounding children’s rights. Using 326 randomly selected US middle and high school newsletters, we found ten significant themes substantively different from but logically linked with organisers’ publicised objectives. The reasons indicate children’s internalisation, a source of autonomy development, of the issues surrounding the shooting and protests. They reveal children’s views on the four key issues that emphasise the need to consider more the convergent and in-between of the mutually exclusive categories in childhood/child rights studies. Future studies should consider treating the being/becoming, nurturance/self-determination rights, and similar, convergent, and in-between categories in dynamic logical disjunctive relations. Our approach and similar child participation research approaches could also be further developed and used.
2018年帕克兰校园枪击事件中儿童的参与、性质、能力、权利及其与成人的差异
我们采用“儿童参与研究作为责任履行和调查”的方法,对2018年帕克兰枪击案中美国儿童参与的原因进行了研究。作为责任承担者,我们强调儿童的抗议参与理由接地气和活。然后,我们探讨了这些原因导致儿童对困扰儿童权利的四个关键问题的看法。我们随机选择了326份美国初中和高中的时事通讯,从中发现了10个重要的主题,它们与组织者公布的目标有本质上的不同,但在逻辑上却有联系。这些原因表明,儿童对枪击和抗议事件的内在化,这是自主发展的一个来源。它们揭示了儿童对四个关键问题的看法,强调需要更多地考虑儿童/儿童权利研究中相互排斥的类别的汇合和中间。未来的研究应考虑在动态逻辑析取关系中对待存在/成为、养育/自决权以及相似、收敛和中间类别。我们的方法和类似的儿童参与研究方法也可以进一步发展和使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信