Mechanisms of formative assessment in the additional professional education of teachers

O. Temnyatkina
{"title":"Mechanisms of formative assessment in the additional professional education of teachers","authors":"O. Temnyatkina","doi":"10.17853/1994-5639-2023-5-106-134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Many studies indicate the low effectiveness of the impact of innovations on the quality of modern education. One of the reasons for this situation is the low level of the subjective position of teachers in the development of innovations in the context of advanced training programmes.It is generally recognised that the formative assessment can directly affect the process of teachers’ person-centred training that is directly related to the processes of individualisation of educational, professional and professional activities. The article presents the experience of organisational process of formative assessment of teachers in the framework of additional professional education.Aim. The present research aims to describe the mechanisms of person-centred formative assessment in additional professional education of teachers when mastering innovations.Methodology and research methods. The study was based on the methodology of the competence-based and system-activity approaches, the author’s concept of the components of activity, taking into account the principles of organising the formative assessment by P. Black & D. Wiliam, the methodology for organising feedback in the conditions of teacher training.As a means of formative assessment in the context of the implementation of the task approach, professional tasks were used to assess the level of mastery by the teacher of innovations corresponding to the competencies of the professional standard. On the basis of emotional-psychological, regulatory, social, analytical, creative components of activity and self-improvement component, the author developed the criteria for the formative assessment in the process of mastering innovative activities by teachers. The study involved 978 Russian and foreign language teachers and mathematics teachers, who participated in advanced training programmes in 2013–2018.Results and scientific novelty. The developed mechanisms of formative assessment within the framework of advanced training programmes made it possible to implement the predictive, diagnostic and corrective functions of formative assessment; reflective dialogues created conditions for the development of the subjectivity of programme participants in the field of formative assessment. The criteria for the formative assessment of the metaprofessional competencies of teachers, designed on the basis of the author’s concept, made it possible to establish a high level of the emotional and psychological component of the activity, motivation of teachers to master innovative technologies of the system-activity approach. The manifestation of analytical and creative components turned out to be at a low level: with great difficulty, trainee teachers overcame traditional approaches to lesson design, stage development activity motivation of students, design of a competence-oriented test. This analysis could be applied as the basis for building a further trajectory for teacher development.Practical significance. The presented mechanisms for organising formative assessment can be effectively used to increase the subjective position of teachers in the development of innovations.","PeriodicalId":278157,"journal":{"name":"The Education and science journal","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Education and science journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2023-5-106-134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Many studies indicate the low effectiveness of the impact of innovations on the quality of modern education. One of the reasons for this situation is the low level of the subjective position of teachers in the development of innovations in the context of advanced training programmes.It is generally recognised that the formative assessment can directly affect the process of teachers’ person-centred training that is directly related to the processes of individualisation of educational, professional and professional activities. The article presents the experience of organisational process of formative assessment of teachers in the framework of additional professional education.Aim. The present research aims to describe the mechanisms of person-centred formative assessment in additional professional education of teachers when mastering innovations.Methodology and research methods. The study was based on the methodology of the competence-based and system-activity approaches, the author’s concept of the components of activity, taking into account the principles of organising the formative assessment by P. Black & D. Wiliam, the methodology for organising feedback in the conditions of teacher training.As a means of formative assessment in the context of the implementation of the task approach, professional tasks were used to assess the level of mastery by the teacher of innovations corresponding to the competencies of the professional standard. On the basis of emotional-psychological, regulatory, social, analytical, creative components of activity and self-improvement component, the author developed the criteria for the formative assessment in the process of mastering innovative activities by teachers. The study involved 978 Russian and foreign language teachers and mathematics teachers, who participated in advanced training programmes in 2013–2018.Results and scientific novelty. The developed mechanisms of formative assessment within the framework of advanced training programmes made it possible to implement the predictive, diagnostic and corrective functions of formative assessment; reflective dialogues created conditions for the development of the subjectivity of programme participants in the field of formative assessment. The criteria for the formative assessment of the metaprofessional competencies of teachers, designed on the basis of the author’s concept, made it possible to establish a high level of the emotional and psychological component of the activity, motivation of teachers to master innovative technologies of the system-activity approach. The manifestation of analytical and creative components turned out to be at a low level: with great difficulty, trainee teachers overcame traditional approaches to lesson design, stage development activity motivation of students, design of a competence-oriented test. This analysis could be applied as the basis for building a further trajectory for teacher development.Practical significance. The presented mechanisms for organising formative assessment can be effectively used to increase the subjective position of teachers in the development of innovations.
教师专业进修中的形成性评价机制
介绍。许多研究表明,创新对现代教育质量影响的有效性较低。造成这种情况的原因之一是教师在高级培训方案创新发展中的主观地位较低。人们普遍认为,形成性评价可以直接影响教师以人为本的培训过程,而教师以人为本的培训过程直接关系到教育、专业和专业活动的个性化过程。本文介绍了在专业附加教育框架下教师形成性评价组织过程的经验。本研究旨在描述以人为本的形成性评估在教师掌握创新时的附加专业教育中的作用机制。方法论和研究方法。该研究基于基于能力和系统活动方法的方法,作者对活动组成部分的概念,考虑到P. Black和D. william组织形成性评估的原则,以及在教师培训条件下组织反馈的方法。在实施任务方法的背景下,作为形成性评估的一种手段,专业任务被用来评估教师对与专业标准能力相对应的创新的掌握程度。本文从活动的情感心理成分、调节性成分、社会性成分、分析性成分、创造性成分和自我完善成分四个方面,构建了教师掌握创新活动过程的形成性评价标准。该研究涉及978名俄语和外语教师以及数学教师,他们在2013-2018年参加了高级培训项目。结果与科学新颖性。在高级培训方案框架内发展的形成性评价机制使形成性评价的预测、诊断和纠正功能得以执行;反思性对话为方案参与者在形成性评价领域的主体性发展创造了条件。基于作者的概念设计的教师元专业能力形成性评估标准,使教师掌握系统活动方法的创新技术的动机能够建立一个高水平的活动的情感和心理成分。分析性和创造性成分的表现水平较低:实习教师克服了传统的课程设计、学生阶段发展活动的动机、能力导向测试的设计等方面的困难。这一分析可以作为进一步构建教师发展轨迹的基础。现实意义。提出的组织形成性评估的机制可以有效地用于提高教师在创新发展中的主观地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信