Consolidation in Soft Soil – Case Study on Prefabricated Vertical Drains (PVDs)

Nadarasa Kuganeswaran, A. Rahim, N. Ali
{"title":"Consolidation in Soft Soil – Case Study on Prefabricated Vertical Drains (PVDs)","authors":"Nadarasa Kuganeswaran, A. Rahim, N. Ali","doi":"10.2174/1874149502115010310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Constructing on soft ground is one of the challenges of geotechnical engineering. The unpredictable behaviour and characteristics of soft soil can cause much damage resulting in high maintenance costs in the post-construction phase.\n \n \n \n The purpose of this study is to analyse the consolidation process and ground improvement method using surcharge and a prefabricated vertical drain by measuring the accuracy of the prediction settlement value with the actual site settlement results.\n \n \n \n An effective ground improvement method is the application of a surcharge and prefabricated vertical drains (PVDs). Various methods can be used to predict the settlement effectively, one such method being PLAXIS 3D simulation. A case study on ground improvement works was selected for this research, where PVDs were constructed and implemented at the site. A few undisturbed samples were collected from the site to generate the parameters based on the lab test conducted in the simulation process. This parameter was carefully studied and representing the principal input for the 3D model, which is generated and represents the actual ground improvement method for the selected case study. The analysis was performed using a borehole and soft soil model to generate the diagram. The prediction settlement value was generated from the PLAXIS 3D analysis as the baseline comparing to the actual results. The factors that influence the settlement value, such as the length and spacing of the prefabricated vertical drain, construction method, and soil characteristics, are also discussed.\n \n \n \n A predicted settlement of 2553 mm was generated by the simulation, while the actual settlement outcome at the site was 2096 mm, a difference of 457 mm, and a prediction accuracy of 82.1%.\n \n \n \n The study found that the combination of surcharge and prefabricated vertical drain in the ground improvement worked well. Also, discussed were the factors that influenced the accuracy of the prediction and the site results.\n","PeriodicalId":350575,"journal":{"name":"The Open Civil Engineering Journal","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Civil Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874149502115010310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Constructing on soft ground is one of the challenges of geotechnical engineering. The unpredictable behaviour and characteristics of soft soil can cause much damage resulting in high maintenance costs in the post-construction phase. The purpose of this study is to analyse the consolidation process and ground improvement method using surcharge and a prefabricated vertical drain by measuring the accuracy of the prediction settlement value with the actual site settlement results. An effective ground improvement method is the application of a surcharge and prefabricated vertical drains (PVDs). Various methods can be used to predict the settlement effectively, one such method being PLAXIS 3D simulation. A case study on ground improvement works was selected for this research, where PVDs were constructed and implemented at the site. A few undisturbed samples were collected from the site to generate the parameters based on the lab test conducted in the simulation process. This parameter was carefully studied and representing the principal input for the 3D model, which is generated and represents the actual ground improvement method for the selected case study. The analysis was performed using a borehole and soft soil model to generate the diagram. The prediction settlement value was generated from the PLAXIS 3D analysis as the baseline comparing to the actual results. The factors that influence the settlement value, such as the length and spacing of the prefabricated vertical drain, construction method, and soil characteristics, are also discussed. A predicted settlement of 2553 mm was generated by the simulation, while the actual settlement outcome at the site was 2096 mm, a difference of 457 mm, and a prediction accuracy of 82.1%. The study found that the combination of surcharge and prefabricated vertical drain in the ground improvement worked well. Also, discussed were the factors that influenced the accuracy of the prediction and the site results.
软土固结——以预制垂直排水管(PVDs)为例
在软土地基上进行施工是岩土工程的挑战之一。软土的不可预测的性质和特性会造成很大的破坏,导致施工后期的维护成本很高。本研究的目的是通过测量沉降预测值与现场实际沉降结果的准确性,分析利用堆填土和预制垂直排水沟进行固结过程和地基改善方法。一种有效的地面改善方法是采用附加材料和预制垂直排水管(PVDs)。有多种方法可以有效地预测沉降,其中一种方法是PLAXIS三维模拟。本研究选取了一个土地改善工程的个案研究,在工地建造和实施pvd。从现场采集少量未受干扰的样品,根据模拟过程中进行的实验室测试生成参数。该参数经过仔细研究,代表了三维模型的主要输入,该模型生成并代表了所选案例研究的实际地面改善方法。利用钻孔和软土模型进行分析,生成图。预测沉降值是由PLAXIS 3D分析生成的,作为与实际结果比较的基线。讨论了影响沉降值的因素,如预制垂直排水管的长度和间距、施工方法、土壤特性等。模拟预测沉降量为2553 mm,而现场实际沉降量为2096 mm,相差457 mm,预测精度为82.1%。研究发现,在地面改造中,堆积物与预制垂直排水管相结合效果良好。讨论了影响预测精度和现场结果的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信