Hadis Dalam Perspektif Sejarah Sosial dan Hukum Islam

Heryani, M. Umar, Ramlah
{"title":"Hadis Dalam Perspektif Sejarah Sosial dan Hukum Islam","authors":"Heryani, M. Umar, Ramlah","doi":"10.58707/jipm.v3i1.405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research examines Hadith as the second source of Islamic legal teachings from the Qur'an. The study of Hadith as a source of Islamic law has attracted the attention of enthusiasts of Hadith studies, not only from Muslims, but also from non-Muslims, even to this day the study of Hadith issues, whether in the form of criticism of its authenticity or methods of understanding, continues to develop both textually. as well as contextually. This research uses a qualitative descriptive method and is a type of library research.­This study found that there were differences among scholars in defining hadith. In history, only a small group of Muslims have rejected hadith as a source of Islamic teachings. They are known as inkarus-sunnah. However, what has become a problem among many Muslims is the criteria for a hadith to become evidence, the scholars have divided hadith based on its quality which is divided into three categories, namely authentic hadith, hasan hadith, and daif hadith. Finally, as forthe function of the Hadith to the Qur'an is as Bayan At-Taqrir (Clarifying the Contents of the Al-Quran), Bayan At-Tafsir (Interpreting the Contents of the Koran), Bayan At-Tasyri (Giving Certainty to Islamic Law That Is Not in the Al-Quran), and Bayan Nasakh (Replacing the Previous Provisions).","PeriodicalId":285197,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Indragiri Penelitian Multidisiplin","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Indragiri Penelitian Multidisiplin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58707/jipm.v3i1.405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research examines Hadith as the second source of Islamic legal teachings from the Qur'an. The study of Hadith as a source of Islamic law has attracted the attention of enthusiasts of Hadith studies, not only from Muslims, but also from non-Muslims, even to this day the study of Hadith issues, whether in the form of criticism of its authenticity or methods of understanding, continues to develop both textually. as well as contextually. This research uses a qualitative descriptive method and is a type of library research.­This study found that there were differences among scholars in defining hadith. In history, only a small group of Muslims have rejected hadith as a source of Islamic teachings. They are known as inkarus-sunnah. However, what has become a problem among many Muslims is the criteria for a hadith to become evidence, the scholars have divided hadith based on its quality which is divided into three categories, namely authentic hadith, hasan hadith, and daif hadith. Finally, as forthe function of the Hadith to the Qur'an is as Bayan At-Taqrir (Clarifying the Contents of the Al-Quran), Bayan At-Tafsir (Interpreting the Contents of the Koran), Bayan At-Tasyri (Giving Certainty to Islamic Law That Is Not in the Al-Quran), and Bayan Nasakh (Replacing the Previous Provisions).
本研究考察圣训作为伊斯兰教法律教义的第二个来源,从古兰经。对圣训作为伊斯兰教法来源的研究吸引了圣训研究爱好者的注意,不仅来自穆斯林,也来自非穆斯林,直到今天,对圣训问题的研究,无论是对其真实性的批评,还是对其理解方法的批评,都继续在文本上发展。以及上下文。本研究采用定性描述方法,属于图书馆研究的一种。-本研究发现学者对圣训的定义存在差异。在历史上,只有一小部分穆斯林拒绝将圣训作为伊斯兰教义的来源。他们被称为因卡鲁-圣行。然而,圣训成为证据的标准成为许多穆斯林的一个问题,学者们根据圣训的质量将圣训分为三类,即正宗圣训、哈桑圣训和代夫圣训。最后,关于《古兰经》的圣训的作用是:澄清《古兰经》的内容,解释《古兰经》的内容,确定《古兰经》中没有的伊斯兰教法,以及取代《古兰经》的规定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信