Religiosity and Subjective Well-Being among Older Adults: A Systematic Review

Sumara Masood Ul Hassan
{"title":"Religiosity and Subjective Well-Being among Older Adults: A Systematic Review","authors":"Sumara Masood Ul Hassan","doi":"10.55032/atskj.psychol.2021.2101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Religiosity acts as a protective agent against the trajectories of ill-being in the later stage of life. The current systematic review aimed to identify and critically evaluate available literature regarding the association between religiosity and subjective well-being. Methodology: Studies were sourced from Google Scholar, Science Direct and Pubmed, published between 2011 and 2017. The eligibility criteria for the selected articles was: subjective well-being as an outcome variable, participants aged 60 and above, studies having crosssectional/comparative, cohort/longitudinal, qualitative, or quantitative research designs, and published in the English language. Findings: After the screening and quality assessment through STROBE and SIGN checklists, a synthesis of 7 out of 77 articles were accumulated. Equivocal patterns of association were observed between religiosity and subjective well-being. It was also found that different dimensions of religiosity exerted positive and negative influences on the subjective well-being of the older adults. Implications: Therefore, focus on the empirical connections between religiosity and subjective well-being will enhance professionals’ knowledge regarding the literature gaps and underlying pathways. It also provides the direction for future studies.","PeriodicalId":181969,"journal":{"name":"ATSK Journal of Psychology","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATSK Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55032/atskj.psychol.2021.2101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: Religiosity acts as a protective agent against the trajectories of ill-being in the later stage of life. The current systematic review aimed to identify and critically evaluate available literature regarding the association between religiosity and subjective well-being. Methodology: Studies were sourced from Google Scholar, Science Direct and Pubmed, published between 2011 and 2017. The eligibility criteria for the selected articles was: subjective well-being as an outcome variable, participants aged 60 and above, studies having crosssectional/comparative, cohort/longitudinal, qualitative, or quantitative research designs, and published in the English language. Findings: After the screening and quality assessment through STROBE and SIGN checklists, a synthesis of 7 out of 77 articles were accumulated. Equivocal patterns of association were observed between religiosity and subjective well-being. It was also found that different dimensions of religiosity exerted positive and negative influences on the subjective well-being of the older adults. Implications: Therefore, focus on the empirical connections between religiosity and subjective well-being will enhance professionals’ knowledge regarding the literature gaps and underlying pathways. It also provides the direction for future studies.
老年人的宗教信仰与主观幸福感:一项系统回顾
目的:宗教信仰作为一种保护剂,在生命的后期阶段防止不健康的轨迹。当前的系统综述旨在识别和批判性地评估有关宗教信仰和主观幸福感之间关系的现有文献。方法:研究来源于谷歌Scholar、Science Direct和Pubmed,发表于2011年至2017年。入选文章的资格标准为:主观幸福感作为结果变量,参与者年龄在60岁及以上,研究采用横断面/比较、队列/纵向、定性或定量研究设计,并以英语发表。结果:通过STROBE和SIGN检查表进行筛选和质量评估后,77篇文章中累积了7篇的综合。在宗教虔诚度和主观幸福感之间观察到模棱两可的关联模式。研究还发现,不同维度的宗教信仰对老年人主观幸福感有积极和消极的影响。启示:因此,关注宗教信仰与主观幸福感之间的实证联系将增强专业人员对文献差距和潜在途径的认识。为今后的研究提供了方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信