Novel Contradiction Resolution in Fixed Point Transformation-based Adaptive Control

H. Khan, J. Tar
{"title":"Novel Contradiction Resolution in Fixed Point Transformation-based Adaptive Control","authors":"H. Khan, J. Tar","doi":"10.1109/CINTI.2018.8928235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the control practice the problem of “underactu-ation” often arises: for controlling the state of a multivariable system the number of the independently applicable control signals is smaller than that of the components of the state variables. Then either certain state components can propagate in time without direct control while the others are precisely controlled, or some compromise has to be elaborated on the basis of which the control forces are “distributed” to keep each variable under partial and imprecise control. Normally, only imprecise and/or incomplete system models are available. Traditionally a compromise is achieved by the use of optimal controllers in which the often contradictory requirements are represented as nonnegative contributions to a cost function that is minimized under the constraints representing the available approximate dynamic model. The heuristic “Receding Horizon Controller” (RHC) uses “Nonlinear Programming” (NP): the optimum is found over a discrete grid by the use of Lagrange's Reduced Gradient Method. For dealing with imprecise modeling and unknown external disturbances the control forces are calculated for and are exerted only over a “short” horizon, then, after observing the actual state by measurements, a new horizon is designed, etc. The adaptive controllers, that normally are designed on the basis of Lyapunov's 2nd method, do not allow simple integration with the optimal controllers. The design of optimal and adaptive controllers is a challenge. To take up this challenge in Adaptive Control Lyapunov's 2nd method was replaced by a “Fixed Point Transformation” (FPT)-based approach. At first the control problem is transformed into finding the fixed point of a contractive map over a Banach Space, then it is solved via iteration. With this approach the contradiction resolution was tackled by time-sharing instead of minimizing a cost function. Alternatively, the minimization of a cost function was tackled by FPT simply by driving the gradient of the Auxiliary Function directly to zero. In the present paper, to our best knowledge in the first time, a novel cost function-free adaptive solution is suggested for underactuated systems in which the compromise between the various requirements is “built in” into the FPT by interpretation. This approach is as heuristic as the RHC, and in general no good convergence can be guaranteed. As an application example the control of a 2 degree of freedom system, the FiztHugh Neuron Model is considered via computer simulations. The possibilities and the limitations of the suggested method are discussed.","PeriodicalId":409514,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Informatics (CINTI)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Informatics (CINTI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CINTI.2018.8928235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In the control practice the problem of “underactu-ation” often arises: for controlling the state of a multivariable system the number of the independently applicable control signals is smaller than that of the components of the state variables. Then either certain state components can propagate in time without direct control while the others are precisely controlled, or some compromise has to be elaborated on the basis of which the control forces are “distributed” to keep each variable under partial and imprecise control. Normally, only imprecise and/or incomplete system models are available. Traditionally a compromise is achieved by the use of optimal controllers in which the often contradictory requirements are represented as nonnegative contributions to a cost function that is minimized under the constraints representing the available approximate dynamic model. The heuristic “Receding Horizon Controller” (RHC) uses “Nonlinear Programming” (NP): the optimum is found over a discrete grid by the use of Lagrange's Reduced Gradient Method. For dealing with imprecise modeling and unknown external disturbances the control forces are calculated for and are exerted only over a “short” horizon, then, after observing the actual state by measurements, a new horizon is designed, etc. The adaptive controllers, that normally are designed on the basis of Lyapunov's 2nd method, do not allow simple integration with the optimal controllers. The design of optimal and adaptive controllers is a challenge. To take up this challenge in Adaptive Control Lyapunov's 2nd method was replaced by a “Fixed Point Transformation” (FPT)-based approach. At first the control problem is transformed into finding the fixed point of a contractive map over a Banach Space, then it is solved via iteration. With this approach the contradiction resolution was tackled by time-sharing instead of minimizing a cost function. Alternatively, the minimization of a cost function was tackled by FPT simply by driving the gradient of the Auxiliary Function directly to zero. In the present paper, to our best knowledge in the first time, a novel cost function-free adaptive solution is suggested for underactuated systems in which the compromise between the various requirements is “built in” into the FPT by interpretation. This approach is as heuristic as the RHC, and in general no good convergence can be guaranteed. As an application example the control of a 2 degree of freedom system, the FiztHugh Neuron Model is considered via computer simulations. The possibilities and the limitations of the suggested method are discussed.
基于不动点变换的自适应控制中新的矛盾解决方法
在控制实践中经常出现“欠驱动”问题:为了控制多变量系统的状态,独立适用的控制信号的数量小于状态变量的分量。然后,要么某些状态成分可以在没有直接控制的情况下及时传播,而其他状态成分则被精确控制,要么必须在控制力“分布”的基础上制定一些折衷方案,以使每个变量处于部分和不精确的控制之下。通常,只有不精确和/或不完整的系统模型可用。传统上,折衷是通过使用最优控制器来实现的,在最优控制器中,经常矛盾的要求被表示为对成本函数的非负贡献,该成本函数在表示可用近似动态模型的约束下被最小化。启发式的“后退地平线控制器”(RHC)使用“非线性规划”(NP):通过使用拉格朗日的降阶方法在离散网格上找到最优解。为了处理不精确的建模和未知的外部干扰,只计算并施加在“短”视界上的控制力,然后,在通过测量观察到实际状态后,设计一个新的视界,等等。通常基于Lyapunov第二方法设计的自适应控制器不允许与最优控制器简单集成。最优和自适应控制器的设计是一个挑战。为了在自适应控制中应对这一挑战,Lyapunov的第二种方法被基于“不动点变换”(FPT)的方法所取代。首先将控制问题转化为寻找Banach空间上的压缩映射的不动点,然后通过迭代求解。在这种方法中,矛盾的解决是通过分时解决的,而不是最小化成本函数。或者,成本函数的最小化由FPT简单地通过驱动辅助函数的梯度直接为零来解决。在本文中,据我们所知,首次提出了一种新的无成本函数自适应解决方案,用于欠驱动系统,其中各种需求之间的折衷通过解释“内置于”FPT中。这种方法和RHC一样是启发式的,通常不能保证很好的收敛性。以2自由度系统的控制为例,通过计算机仿真研究了FiztHugh神经元模型。讨论了所建议方法的可能性和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书