The Intersectionality of Colonialism and Gǐkũyũ Land Tenure Systems: A Feminist Political Ecology Perspective

{"title":"The Intersectionality of Colonialism and Gǐkũyũ Land Tenure Systems: A Feminist Political Ecology Perspective","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/eesrr.05.04.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Agĩkũyũ in Kenya revered land as a spiritual gift from God in which communities and nature were inextricably linked to preserve sacred ecosystems and biodiversity. However, the intersectionality with colonialism and the expansion of capitalism propelled by the Berlin Conference in 1884-1885, changed the landscape tragically. In 1893, it was affirmed that the ownership of land was by occupational rights and unoccupied land belonged to the colonial state and white settlers. In 1895, Kenya became part of the British East Africa Protectorate and the Crown Land Ordinance of 1902 made Kenya a British Colony, in which by 1915, the Kenyan land became under the British Empire. Many locations especially in Gǐkũyũ areas experienced devastating displacement, landlessness and human adaptations in new ecological conditions, control and resources use in the agricultural pastoral communities. These problems led to political consciousness and in 1954 under the Swynnerton Plan, the Gǐkũyũ land tenure system became the basis for land reforms until 1970s. This paper extends the literature on colonialism and land ownership mainly centering on Africans reacting to the British imperialism and histories of underdevelopment by addressing the intersectionality of colonialism and the dynamic of gendered responses to colonialism at intra-household level, and as the base of history, political and economic systems influencing women, health, and ecology. The focus is on Gĩkũyũ families within the contexts of colonial and post- colonial policies of land consolidation, adjudication and land registration to private ownership of property. The land confiscated by the Europeans, deeply affected the Gǐkũyũ ethnic group, and it was their grievances over land that eventually became Kenya’s most controversial political project leading to the conflict between British, and the Mau Mau movement, and finally to independence in 1963. I use a feminist political ecology, which is inclusive to indigenous knowledge and spirituality in order to capture the understanding of and the experiences of communities responding to global processes of political, economic and ecological changes.","PeriodicalId":298809,"journal":{"name":"Earth & Environmental Science Research & Reviews","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth & Environmental Science Research & Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/eesrr.05.04.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Agĩkũyũ in Kenya revered land as a spiritual gift from God in which communities and nature were inextricably linked to preserve sacred ecosystems and biodiversity. However, the intersectionality with colonialism and the expansion of capitalism propelled by the Berlin Conference in 1884-1885, changed the landscape tragically. In 1893, it was affirmed that the ownership of land was by occupational rights and unoccupied land belonged to the colonial state and white settlers. In 1895, Kenya became part of the British East Africa Protectorate and the Crown Land Ordinance of 1902 made Kenya a British Colony, in which by 1915, the Kenyan land became under the British Empire. Many locations especially in Gǐkũyũ areas experienced devastating displacement, landlessness and human adaptations in new ecological conditions, control and resources use in the agricultural pastoral communities. These problems led to political consciousness and in 1954 under the Swynnerton Plan, the Gǐkũyũ land tenure system became the basis for land reforms until 1970s. This paper extends the literature on colonialism and land ownership mainly centering on Africans reacting to the British imperialism and histories of underdevelopment by addressing the intersectionality of colonialism and the dynamic of gendered responses to colonialism at intra-household level, and as the base of history, political and economic systems influencing women, health, and ecology. The focus is on Gĩkũyũ families within the contexts of colonial and post- colonial policies of land consolidation, adjudication and land registration to private ownership of property. The land confiscated by the Europeans, deeply affected the Gǐkũyũ ethnic group, and it was their grievances over land that eventually became Kenya’s most controversial political project leading to the conflict between British, and the Mau Mau movement, and finally to independence in 1963. I use a feminist political ecology, which is inclusive to indigenous knowledge and spirituality in order to capture the understanding of and the experiences of communities responding to global processes of political, economic and ecological changes.
殖民主义与Gǐkũyũ土地权属制度的交叉性:女性主义政治生态学视角
肯尼亚的Agĩkũyũ将土地视为上帝赐予的精神礼物,社区和自然不可分割地联系在一起,以保护神圣的生态系统和生物多样性。然而,1884-1885年柏林会议推动的殖民主义和资本主义扩张交织在一起,悲剧性地改变了局面。1893年,它确认土地所有权是职业权利,未占用的土地属于殖民国家和白人定居者。1895年,肯尼亚成为英国东非保护国的一部分,1902年的《皇家土地条例》使肯尼亚成为英国殖民地,到1915年,肯尼亚的土地成为大英帝国的一部分。许多地方,特别是Gǐkũyũ地区,经历了毁灭性的流离失所、无地和人类适应新的生态条件、农业牧区的控制和资源利用。这些问题导致了政治意识的觉醒,1954年根据斯温纳顿计划,Gǐkũyũ土地权属制度成为土地改革的基础,直到20世纪70年代。本文扩展了关于殖民主义和土地所有权的文献,主要集中在非洲人对英国帝国主义的反应和不发达的历史上,通过解决殖民主义的交叉性和家庭内部对殖民主义的性别反应的动态,并作为影响妇女、健康和生态的历史、政治和经济制度的基础。重点是在殖民和后殖民时期土地合并、判决和土地登记到财产私有制的政策范围内的Gĩkũyũ家庭。被欧洲人没收的土地深深影响了Gǐkũyũ民族,正是他们对土地的不满,最终成为肯尼亚最具争议的政治项目,导致了英国和茅茅运动之间的冲突,并最终导致了1963年的独立。我使用女权主义政治生态学,它包含了土著知识和精神,以捕捉社区对全球政治、经济和生态变化过程的理解和经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信