Problematic Issues of Scientific and Methodical Support of the Forensic Cost Evaluation of Real Estate Objects and the Ways to Solve Them

D. Ivanov, O. G. Karnaukhova, P. Kozin, D. D. Kuznetsov
{"title":"Problematic Issues of Scientific and Methodical Support of the Forensic Cost Evaluation of Real Estate Objects and the Ways to Solve Them","authors":"D. Ivanov, O. G. Karnaukhova, P. Kozin, D. D. Kuznetsov","doi":"10.30764/1819-2785-2022-3-51-69","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the article is to develop a scientific and methodical support for the forensic cost evaluation of real estate objects defferent from the federal appraisal standards. The authors solve the problem of comparative analysis of the professional activity of a real estate appraiser and a forensic expert who determines the market value, they also reveal their formal and substantive differences. They come to a reasonable conclusion about the necessity to develop a special methodology for forensic cost evaluation, as a study focused on the judicial system and considering the modern achievements in construction sciences, international valuation standards.The proposed methodology includes the analysis of two evaluations presented by the litigants and the fair (equilibrium) value of the property in a forensic expert’s opinion. The authors offer to compare two cost models identifying the critical parameters that led to the formation of the initial cost interval.The proposed version of scientific and methodical support does not require changes in the legislation and federal evaluation standards, but it involves the development of the guidelines for determining fair value by comparing the estimates submitted to the court by the parties to the dispute. The suggested methodology presents some additional opportunities for the development of a system of pre-trial resolution of disputes.","PeriodicalId":300595,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Practice of Forensic Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Practice of Forensic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2022-3-51-69","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the article is to develop a scientific and methodical support for the forensic cost evaluation of real estate objects defferent from the federal appraisal standards. The authors solve the problem of comparative analysis of the professional activity of a real estate appraiser and a forensic expert who determines the market value, they also reveal their formal and substantive differences. They come to a reasonable conclusion about the necessity to develop a special methodology for forensic cost evaluation, as a study focused on the judicial system and considering the modern achievements in construction sciences, international valuation standards.The proposed methodology includes the analysis of two evaluations presented by the litigants and the fair (equilibrium) value of the property in a forensic expert’s opinion. The authors offer to compare two cost models identifying the critical parameters that led to the formation of the initial cost interval.The proposed version of scientific and methodical support does not require changes in the legislation and federal evaluation standards, but it involves the development of the guidelines for determining fair value by comparing the estimates submitted to the court by the parties to the dispute. The suggested methodology presents some additional opportunities for the development of a system of pre-trial resolution of disputes.
房地产物证成本评估科学、系统支撑的问题及解决途径
本文旨在为不同于联邦鉴定标准的不动产法医学成本鉴定提供科学、系统的依据。本文解决了房地产估价师和司法鉴定专家确定市场价值的专业活动的比较分析问题,揭示了两者在形式上和实质上的区别。他们得出了一个合理的结论,即有必要开发一种专门的法医成本评估方法,作为一项以司法系统为重点的研究,并考虑到现代建筑科学的成就,国际估价标准。拟议的方法包括分析诉讼当事人提出的两项评估以及法医专家认为财产的公平(平衡)价值。作者提供了两种成本模型的比较,确定了导致初始成本区间形成的关键参数。拟议的科学和方法支持不需要改变立法和联邦评估标准,但它涉及制定通过比较争端各方提交给法院的估计数来确定公平价值的指导方针。所建议的方法为发展审前解决争端的制度提供了一些额外的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书