Budget Accountability in The Perspective of Habermas Communicative Action Theory

M. Mahdalena, Haliah, Syarifuddin, Darwis Said
{"title":"Budget Accountability in The Perspective of Habermas Communicative Action Theory","authors":"M. Mahdalena, Haliah, Syarifuddin, Darwis Said","doi":"10.52970/GRSSE.V1I2.73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectively, the purpose of this study is to produce a concept of accountability that is free from domination, which can synergize the accountability of the executive, legislative, and community and is oriented towards the liberation of communication. The expected result of this research is to be able to contribute, both theoretically and practically. The ideas from this research can be used as a reference for other researchers to test empirically with different approaches. Virtually, this research provides an idea for the opening of space for the public to be actively involved in all stages of the public accountability process to give input or criticism in the context of policy-making. To explore social reality as empirical material, the collaboration of several methods in this research was carried out as follows: Observation and interviews. Furthermore, based on the collected data, it will be netted and grouped based on specific categories and codes. Based on the previous description, this study produces a concept of accountability which the author calls triple accountability. Practically in the author's view, this concept is quite effectively implemented. This view adopts Habermas's communicative action theory that communication based rationality effectively overcomes social problems in human life, including government order.","PeriodicalId":198314,"journal":{"name":"Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52970/GRSSE.V1I2.73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Objectively, the purpose of this study is to produce a concept of accountability that is free from domination, which can synergize the accountability of the executive, legislative, and community and is oriented towards the liberation of communication. The expected result of this research is to be able to contribute, both theoretically and practically. The ideas from this research can be used as a reference for other researchers to test empirically with different approaches. Virtually, this research provides an idea for the opening of space for the public to be actively involved in all stages of the public accountability process to give input or criticism in the context of policy-making. To explore social reality as empirical material, the collaboration of several methods in this research was carried out as follows: Observation and interviews. Furthermore, based on the collected data, it will be netted and grouped based on specific categories and codes. Based on the previous description, this study produces a concept of accountability which the author calls triple accountability. Practically in the author's view, this concept is quite effectively implemented. This view adopts Habermas's communicative action theory that communication based rationality effectively overcomes social problems in human life, including government order.
哈贝马斯交往行为理论视角下的预算问责制
客观上,本研究的目的是产生一种不受支配的问责制概念,它可以协同行政、立法和社区的问责制,并面向传播的解放。本研究的预期结果是能够在理论和实践上有所贡献。本研究的观点可以作为其他研究者使用不同方法进行实证检验的参考。实际上,这项研究提供了一个想法,即开放空间,让公众积极参与公共问责过程的各个阶段,在政策制定的背景下提供投入或批评。为了探索作为实证材料的社会现实,本研究采用了以下几种方法的合作:观察和访谈。此外,根据收集到的数据,将根据具体的类别和代码进行筛选和分组。在上述描述的基础上,本研究提出了问责制的概念,笔者称之为三重问责制。实际上,在作者看来,这一概念得到了相当有效的实施。这一观点采用了哈贝马斯的交往行为理论,即基于交往的理性有效地克服了人类生活中的社会问题,包括政府秩序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信