Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary scholarship for a civilisation in distress: questions for and from the Global South

IF 3.5
Marcel Bursztyn, S. Purushothaman
{"title":"Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary scholarship for a civilisation in distress: questions for and from the Global South","authors":"Marcel Bursztyn, S. Purushothaman","doi":"10.1332/lbeq6699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite obstacles, institutional barriers and prejudices, interdisciplinarity is a growing movement within academia. Evolving from the pioneering experiences in broad multidisciplinary ventures since the post–Second World War era, interdisciplinary programmes and research projects are now a worldwide reality in universities. Complex and interconnected challenges of humanity, such as social unrests, economic and ecological crises, political turmoil and global human health emergencies demand integration of efforts and competencies of researchers from a wide range of backgrounds, and the involvement of actors from outside the academia. In recent years, complex challenges fuelling the need for better integration of work in universities and research centres with real demands of societies are further feeding transdisciplinary endeavours. Such movements pose new questions, ranging from institutional arrangements to methodological frameworks, which are far from being solved. This article reflects on the nature and practice of scholarly engagement in this trajectory during the 21st century from vantage points of the Global South. Some insights are based on what we have learnt over our work lives, and some are based on collected information about experiences in India and Brazil. This contribution also raises questions that could potentially concern other countries, especially in the Global South. However, it is not a handbook directly applicable to realities other than Brazil and India. Discussions in academia about pathways to interdisciplinarity should go beyond its legitimisation. The agenda now has to shift towards transdisciplinary co-construction of knowledge, by creating gateways to connect the scientific world to the ‘real world’.","PeriodicalId":274267,"journal":{"name":"Global Social Challenges Journal","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Social Challenges Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/lbeq6699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Despite obstacles, institutional barriers and prejudices, interdisciplinarity is a growing movement within academia. Evolving from the pioneering experiences in broad multidisciplinary ventures since the post–Second World War era, interdisciplinary programmes and research projects are now a worldwide reality in universities. Complex and interconnected challenges of humanity, such as social unrests, economic and ecological crises, political turmoil and global human health emergencies demand integration of efforts and competencies of researchers from a wide range of backgrounds, and the involvement of actors from outside the academia. In recent years, complex challenges fuelling the need for better integration of work in universities and research centres with real demands of societies are further feeding transdisciplinary endeavours. Such movements pose new questions, ranging from institutional arrangements to methodological frameworks, which are far from being solved. This article reflects on the nature and practice of scholarly engagement in this trajectory during the 21st century from vantage points of the Global South. Some insights are based on what we have learnt over our work lives, and some are based on collected information about experiences in India and Brazil. This contribution also raises questions that could potentially concern other countries, especially in the Global South. However, it is not a handbook directly applicable to realities other than Brazil and India. Discussions in academia about pathways to interdisciplinarity should go beyond its legitimisation. The agenda now has to shift towards transdisciplinary co-construction of knowledge, by creating gateways to connect the scientific world to the ‘real world’.
一个处于困境的文明的跨学科和跨学科的学术研究:来自全球南方的问题
尽管存在障碍、制度障碍和偏见,跨学科在学术界仍是一个日益增长的运动。从第二次世界大战后在广泛的多学科企业的开创性经验演变而来,跨学科课程和研究项目现在是世界范围内大学的现实。社会动荡、经济和生态危机、政治动荡以及全球人类卫生紧急情况等人类面临的复杂和相互关联的挑战,需要整合来自广泛背景的研究人员的努力和能力,并需要学术界以外的行动者的参与。近年来,复杂的挑战促使大学和研究中心的工作与社会的实际需求更好地整合,这进一步推动了跨学科的努力。这种运动提出了新的问题,从体制安排到方法框架,这些问题远未得到解决。本文从全球南方的有利位置出发,反思了21世纪这一轨迹中学术参与的性质和实践。有些见解是基于我们在工作生活中学到的,有些是基于我们在印度和巴西收集到的经验信息。这一贡献也提出了可能涉及其他国家的问题,特别是全球南方国家。然而,它不是一本直接适用于巴西和印度以外现实的手册。学术界关于跨学科途径的讨论应超越其合法性。现在的议程必须通过创建连接科学世界和“现实世界”的门户,转向知识的跨学科共同构建。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书