Profil Kemampuan Literasi Kuantitatif dan Kualitas Argumentasi Siswa pada Konsep Biologi

Melati Fitriani
{"title":"Profil Kemampuan Literasi Kuantitatif dan Kualitas Argumentasi Siswa pada Konsep Biologi","authors":"Melati Fitriani","doi":"10.32332/al-jahiz.v3i1.4750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As one of the basic skills in an effort to develop the quality of human resources in the 21st century, this research based on the development of quanti tative literacy capability and argumentation through biology learning. This study is a preliminary study to analyze students 'early capability of quantitative literacy and high school students' argumentation through their profiles.  The research subjects involved were 37 students of 12th grade MIPA. This research was conducted in Islamic Senior High School 2 Lebak by using purposive sampling technique. The research data were collected using a description test that measured quantitative literacy capability with four indicators (interpretation, representation, calculation, and analysis), while the quality of argumentation with written argumentation. Instruments used in quantitative literacy questions refer to the assessment rubric of the Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC & U) and consists of four essay questions covering one indicator on each question. The instruments used in the argumentation problem refers to Sandoval & Millwood for the aspect of argumentation and Erduran for the level of argumentation which consists of three essay questions that cover aspects of conceptual quality and epistemic quality aspects. The results of preliminary study of achievement of each indicator on quantitative literacy capability indicate that the percentage of students who reach level 2 (Milestones) more than other level with details: interpretation (56.8%), representation (48.6%),  calculation (59.5%), the most dominant analysis is Level 1 (73%). Furthermore, the results of argumentation test shows that the level mostly achieved by Islamic Senior High School students is Level 2 (51.4%).","PeriodicalId":201865,"journal":{"name":"Al Jahiz: Journal of Biology Education Research","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al Jahiz: Journal of Biology Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32332/al-jahiz.v3i1.4750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As one of the basic skills in an effort to develop the quality of human resources in the 21st century, this research based on the development of quanti tative literacy capability and argumentation through biology learning. This study is a preliminary study to analyze students 'early capability of quantitative literacy and high school students' argumentation through their profiles.  The research subjects involved were 37 students of 12th grade MIPA. This research was conducted in Islamic Senior High School 2 Lebak by using purposive sampling technique. The research data were collected using a description test that measured quantitative literacy capability with four indicators (interpretation, representation, calculation, and analysis), while the quality of argumentation with written argumentation. Instruments used in quantitative literacy questions refer to the assessment rubric of the Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC & U) and consists of four essay questions covering one indicator on each question. The instruments used in the argumentation problem refers to Sandoval & Millwood for the aspect of argumentation and Erduran for the level of argumentation which consists of three essay questions that cover aspects of conceptual quality and epistemic quality aspects. The results of preliminary study of achievement of each indicator on quantitative literacy capability indicate that the percentage of students who reach level 2 (Milestones) more than other level with details: interpretation (56.8%), representation (48.6%),  calculation (59.5%), the most dominant analysis is Level 1 (73%). Furthermore, the results of argumentation test shows that the level mostly achieved by Islamic Senior High School students is Level 2 (51.4%).
学生在生物学概念上的定量素养和推理能力概况
作为培养21世纪人力资源素质的基本技能之一,本研究基于生物学习对定量读写能力和论证能力的培养。本研究是一项初步的研究,通过学生的档案分析学生的早期定量读写能力和高中学生的议论文能力。研究对象为37名高三学生。本研究采用有目的抽样方法在勒巴克伊斯兰高中2年级进行。研究数据的收集采用描述测试,通过四个指标(解释、表达、计算和分析)来衡量定量读写能力,而通过书面论证来衡量议论文质量。在定量读写问题中使用的工具参考美国学院和大学协会(aac&u)的评估标准,由四个问答问题组成,每个问题涵盖一个指标。在论证问题中使用的工具是指桑多瓦尔和米尔伍德的论证方面和Erduran的论证水平,其中包括三个论文问题,涵盖概念质量和认知质量方面。对定量读写能力各指标成就的初步研究结果表明,达到二级(里程碑)的学生比例高于其他水平,具体为:解释(56.8%),表达(48.6%),计算(59.5%),分析最占优势的是一级(73%)。此外,辩论测试结果显示,伊斯兰高中学生达到的水平最多的是2级(51.4%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信