{"title":"Minimum Stress Trends in Stacked Mass Transport Deposits, Deepwater Guyana","authors":"T. Fitts, S. Hoffmann, S. Karner, M. Sundberg","doi":"10.3997/2214-4609.201900515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In pressure predictions for early Stabroek exploration wells, minimum stress was calculated using the Terzaghi soil mechanics method (Matthews and Kelly, 1967) and a standard range of effective stress ratios according to Shmin=K0(Sv-Pp) Pp, where Shmin is minimum stress, Sv is the overburden, PP is the pore fluid pressure and K0 is the effective stress ratio. These calculated profiles were compared to minimum stress estimates obtained from leak-off tests, pressure integrity tests, and lost return events. In several cases, the well data suggested significantly higher minimum stresses than predicted, with most tests in the deeper MTDs approaching the estimated overburden stress. To address the applicability of these estimates for minimum stress to future well planning, several interpreted mechanisms for these elevated stresses were proposed and investigated.","PeriodicalId":295902,"journal":{"name":"Second EAGE Workshop on Pore Pressure Prediction","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Second EAGE Workshop on Pore Pressure Prediction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201900515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In pressure predictions for early Stabroek exploration wells, minimum stress was calculated using the Terzaghi soil mechanics method (Matthews and Kelly, 1967) and a standard range of effective stress ratios according to Shmin=K0(Sv-Pp) Pp, where Shmin is minimum stress, Sv is the overburden, PP is the pore fluid pressure and K0 is the effective stress ratio. These calculated profiles were compared to minimum stress estimates obtained from leak-off tests, pressure integrity tests, and lost return events. In several cases, the well data suggested significantly higher minimum stresses than predicted, with most tests in the deeper MTDs approaching the estimated overburden stress. To address the applicability of these estimates for minimum stress to future well planning, several interpreted mechanisms for these elevated stresses were proposed and investigated.
在Stabroek早期探井的压力预测中,使用Terzaghi土力学方法(Matthews and Kelly, 1967)计算最小应力,并根据Shmin=K0(Sv-Pp) Pp的标准有效应力比范围计算最小应力,其中Shmin为最小应力,Sv为覆盖层,Pp为孔隙流体压力,K0为有效应力比。将这些计算的剖面与从泄漏测试、压力完整性测试和漏失事件中获得的最小应力估计值进行比较。在一些情况下,井数据显示的最小应力明显高于预测值,在较深的mtd中进行的大多数测试接近估计的上覆应力。为了解决这些最小应力估计值对未来井规划的适用性问题,研究人员提出并研究了这些高应力的几种解释机制。