Statistical Modelling of Road Traffic Accidents: Pattern and Trend in Kogi State, Nigeria

O. Halid, A. Ilesanmi, T. Oseni
{"title":"Statistical Modelling of Road Traffic Accidents: Pattern and Trend in Kogi State, Nigeria","authors":"O. Halid, A. Ilesanmi, T. Oseni","doi":"10.28924/ada/stat.3.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Road traffic accident (RTA) is defined as unplanned car crash that causes injuries, fatalities, and property damage. In order to better understand the pattern and trend of road traffic accident in Kogi state, Nigeria, we statistically modeled RTA data collected from Federal Road Safety Corps, Lokoja from January 2017 to December 2021. The data consisted of monthly RTA types and outcomes. The RTA types considered were fatal, serious and minor while the RTA outcomes were death, injury and no injury. Time series modeling was adopted for modeling and predicting the accident rates while Pearson correlation was used to determine the degree of relationship between RTA types and outcomes. Results showed that there were steady fluctuations in the patterns of RTA types and outcomes between February and October while there were upward trend in RTA from November to January. The augmented Dickey-Fuller test showed that RTA series was stationary and out of 10 candidate models obtained using ACF and PACF plots, the best model suitable for forecasting RTA rate was found to be ARIMA(1,0,1) using mean absolute deviation (MAD) and mean square error (MSE) selection criteria. In order to estimate the parameters of the model, the Shapiro-Wilk test was conducted on the RTA values and its residuals to confirm normality. Since p < 0.05 in both cases, they were both found to be non-normal, then the least absolute deviation (LAD) estimator was used for estimation. This gives rise to Yt = 29.0574 + 0.492151Xt-1 + 0.99994et-1 + εt as the best fitted model, which was found to be statistically significant at α=0.05. The estimated model was used to forecast RTA for 30months with 95percent confidence level and result showed that the forecast were good and there will continually be occurrence of RTA nearly every month and there will be higher RTA rates between November and January. The result of the Pearson correlation showed that fatal accident were 71percent more likely associated to death while serious accident were 61percent more likely associated to injury.","PeriodicalId":153849,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Statistics","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28924/ada/stat.3.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Road traffic accident (RTA) is defined as unplanned car crash that causes injuries, fatalities, and property damage. In order to better understand the pattern and trend of road traffic accident in Kogi state, Nigeria, we statistically modeled RTA data collected from Federal Road Safety Corps, Lokoja from January 2017 to December 2021. The data consisted of monthly RTA types and outcomes. The RTA types considered were fatal, serious and minor while the RTA outcomes were death, injury and no injury. Time series modeling was adopted for modeling and predicting the accident rates while Pearson correlation was used to determine the degree of relationship between RTA types and outcomes. Results showed that there were steady fluctuations in the patterns of RTA types and outcomes between February and October while there were upward trend in RTA from November to January. The augmented Dickey-Fuller test showed that RTA series was stationary and out of 10 candidate models obtained using ACF and PACF plots, the best model suitable for forecasting RTA rate was found to be ARIMA(1,0,1) using mean absolute deviation (MAD) and mean square error (MSE) selection criteria. In order to estimate the parameters of the model, the Shapiro-Wilk test was conducted on the RTA values and its residuals to confirm normality. Since p < 0.05 in both cases, they were both found to be non-normal, then the least absolute deviation (LAD) estimator was used for estimation. This gives rise to Yt = 29.0574 + 0.492151Xt-1 + 0.99994et-1 + εt as the best fitted model, which was found to be statistically significant at α=0.05. The estimated model was used to forecast RTA for 30months with 95percent confidence level and result showed that the forecast were good and there will continually be occurrence of RTA nearly every month and there will be higher RTA rates between November and January. The result of the Pearson correlation showed that fatal accident were 71percent more likely associated to death while serious accident were 61percent more likely associated to injury.
道路交通事故统计建模:尼日利亚科吉州的模式和趋势
道路交通事故(RTA)被定义为造成伤害、死亡和财产损失的意外车祸。为了更好地了解尼日利亚科吉州道路交通事故的模式和趋势,我们对2017年1月至2021年12月从洛科贾联邦道路安全队收集的RTA数据进行了统计建模。数据包括每月RTA类型和结果。考虑的RTA类型为致命、严重和轻微,而RTA结果为死亡、损伤和无损伤。采用时间序列模型对事故率进行建模和预测,采用Pearson相关法确定RTA类型与结果的关系程度。结果表明:2 - 10月RTA类型和结果呈现稳定波动,11 - 1月RTA呈上升趋势;增广Dickey-Fuller检验表明,RTA序列是平稳的,在使用ACF和PACF图获得的10个候选模型中,使用平均绝对偏差(MAD)和均方误差(MSE)选择标准的ARIMA(1,0,1)模型最适合预测RTA率。为了估计模型的参数,对RTA值及其残差进行Shapiro-Wilk检验,以确认正态性。由于两种情况的p都< 0.05,因此都是非正态的,因此使用最小绝对偏差(least absolute deviation, LAD)估计量进行估计。由此得出Yt = 29.0574 + 0.492151Xt-1 + 0.99994et-1 + εt为最优拟合模型,在α=0.05时具有统计学显著性。利用估计模型对30个月的RTA进行了预测,置信度为95%,结果表明,预测结果较好,几乎每个月都将持续发生RTA, 11月至1月RTA发生率较高。Pearson相关分析结果显示,致命事故与死亡相关的概率为71%,严重事故与受伤相关的概率为61%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信