J. Boehnert, I. Gaziulusoy, Dan Lockton, I. N. Pettersen, Matt Sinclair
{"title":"Track 2.d Introduction: Power and Politics in Design for Transition","authors":"J. Boehnert, I. Gaziulusoy, Dan Lockton, I. N. Pettersen, Matt Sinclair","doi":"10.33114/adim.2019.2d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This track sought to contribute to design’s potential to shift, redirect and transform power relations to achieve sustainability. We sought to direct attention to the political potential in and politics of transition design with a focus on the many ways that power flows through the systems in which design operates. Our intention was to address, directly, the commentary from the DRS2018 track on Designing for Transitions, which noted that authors had tended to “stay on the safe and perhaps conventional side” of the subject. Instead, we hoped that the papers in this track would address “‘politicised issues such as migration, decoloniality, the politics of climate change mitigation… and other complex and controversial problems” (Boehnert et al. 2018) that must be considered in planning and implementation of ongoing sustainability transitions. The politics of design transitions remains marginal in design research. With our call, we hoped to receive contributions that problematised design’s current roles and conceptualised new roles for design in the context of sustainability transitions to attend to issues related to how power is and should be dealt with. ","PeriodicalId":344521,"journal":{"name":"Conference Proceedings of the Academy for Design Innovation Management","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conference Proceedings of the Academy for Design Innovation Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33114/adim.2019.2d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This track sought to contribute to design’s potential to shift, redirect and transform power relations to achieve sustainability. We sought to direct attention to the political potential in and politics of transition design with a focus on the many ways that power flows through the systems in which design operates. Our intention was to address, directly, the commentary from the DRS2018 track on Designing for Transitions, which noted that authors had tended to “stay on the safe and perhaps conventional side” of the subject. Instead, we hoped that the papers in this track would address “‘politicised issues such as migration, decoloniality, the politics of climate change mitigation… and other complex and controversial problems” (Boehnert et al. 2018) that must be considered in planning and implementation of ongoing sustainability transitions. The politics of design transitions remains marginal in design research. With our call, we hoped to receive contributions that problematised design’s current roles and conceptualised new roles for design in the context of sustainability transitions to attend to issues related to how power is and should be dealt with.
这条赛道试图为设计的潜力做出贡献,以改变、重新定位和改变权力关系,以实现可持续发展。我们试图将注意力转移到过渡设计的政治潜力和政治上,重点关注权力在设计运作的系统中流动的多种方式。我们的目的是直接解决DRS2018关于过渡设计的评论,该评论指出,作者倾向于“保持安全,也许是传统的一面”。相反,我们希望这一方向的论文能够解决“政治化问题,如移民、非殖民化、减缓气候变化的政治……以及其他复杂和有争议的问题”(Boehnert et al. 2018),这些问题必须在规划和实施正在进行的可持续性转型时加以考虑。设计转型的政治在设计研究中仍然处于边缘地位。通过我们的呼吁,我们希望收到的贡献是,在可持续性过渡的背景下,设计的当前角色和概念化的新角色,以关注与如何处理权力相关的问题。