Societal Complexity versus Learn to Live Together: Contemporaneous ‘Science/Culture/Religion Dialogue.’ Compram Methodology and ‘Decisional Nomology’ Contributions (Presentation Slides)

N. Bulz
{"title":"Societal Complexity versus Learn to Live Together: Contemporaneous ‘Science/Culture/Religion Dialogue.’ Compram Methodology and ‘Decisional Nomology’ Contributions (Presentation Slides)","authors":"N. Bulz","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3209138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is the OR community’s related heritage, challenge, tensions/perspectives within the possible ‘Science/Culture/Religion Dialogue.’ In order to acknowledge the tragedy of war (mostly within the actual 100 years from the end of the WW1) at least the scientific community would advance any alternative solution comparing to the war oriented track of the 20 century – and no significant ideas/acts within the started 21 century. There is the projects oriented (re)search from the still open International Consortium Generosity/Creativity/Solidarity: LEARN TO LIVE TOGETHER (hypothetical) reality, modeling/simulation/emulation and ideals generations – as a subtle turning point into the possible Network of Networks on. The co-organizers of the current OR and Ethics stream into Euro Conference 2018 Valencia have synergic and original contributions within – i.e. Prof. dr. Dorien DeTombe’s COMPRAM Methodology, and Prof. dr. Cathal Brugha’s Decisional Nomology. So, the study proceeds on the open Ethics and OR new realm onto the contemporary global (post-)crisis reverse as Inter/Trans/Co-disciplinary, Intercultural and Ecumenical approaches oriented within the thesis: Knowledge Society toward Consciousness Society. A related (f)act to tacit and explicit knowledge/innovation, and follow up consequences would draw up and extend an implementation of a ‘Local’ Nucleus of an IN OVO inquiring “Science-NATURE-Culture-SPIRITUALITY-Religion Meta-Dialogue�?.","PeriodicalId":301526,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of Innovation eJournal","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology of Innovation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3209138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is the OR community’s related heritage, challenge, tensions/perspectives within the possible ‘Science/Culture/Religion Dialogue.’ In order to acknowledge the tragedy of war (mostly within the actual 100 years from the end of the WW1) at least the scientific community would advance any alternative solution comparing to the war oriented track of the 20 century – and no significant ideas/acts within the started 21 century. There is the projects oriented (re)search from the still open International Consortium Generosity/Creativity/Solidarity: LEARN TO LIVE TOGETHER (hypothetical) reality, modeling/simulation/emulation and ideals generations – as a subtle turning point into the possible Network of Networks on. The co-organizers of the current OR and Ethics stream into Euro Conference 2018 Valencia have synergic and original contributions within – i.e. Prof. dr. Dorien DeTombe’s COMPRAM Methodology, and Prof. dr. Cathal Brugha’s Decisional Nomology. So, the study proceeds on the open Ethics and OR new realm onto the contemporary global (post-)crisis reverse as Inter/Trans/Co-disciplinary, Intercultural and Ecumenical approaches oriented within the thesis: Knowledge Society toward Consciousness Society. A related (f)act to tacit and explicit knowledge/innovation, and follow up consequences would draw up and extend an implementation of a ‘Local’ Nucleus of an IN OVO inquiring “Science-NATURE-Culture-SPIRITUALITY-Religion Meta-Dialogue�?.
社会复杂性与学会共同生活:当代“科学/文化/宗教对话”。“比较方法学”和“决策法理学”的贡献(幻灯片)
在可能的“科学/文化/宗教对话”中,有OR社区相关的遗产、挑战、紧张/观点。为了承认战争的悲剧(主要是在第一次世界大战结束后的100年内),至少科学界会提出任何替代解决方案,与20世纪以战争为导向的轨道相比——而在21世纪初没有任何重大的想法/行动。有一个面向(重新)搜索的项目,来自仍然开放的国际联盟慷慨/创造力/团结:学会共同生活(假设)现实,建模/模拟/仿真和理想世代-作为一个微妙的转折点,进入可能的网络网络上。目前的OR和伦理流的共同组织者在2018年瓦伦西亚欧洲会议中有协同和原创的贡献-即Dorien DeTombe教授博士的COMPRAM方法论和Cathal Brugha教授博士的决策法理学。因此,研究继续从开放伦理和OR的新领域转向当代全球(后)危机,作为论文中指向的跨/跨/跨学科,跨文化和普世主义的方法:从知识社会走向意识社会。与隐性和显性知识/创新相关的(f)行为,以及后续后果将制定并扩展一个“本地”核心的实施,该核心是一个“科学-自然-文化-精神-宗教元对话”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信