Axiological space of coevals of independence of Ukraine: sociological dimensions

N. Chernysh, M. Boretska
{"title":"Axiological space of coevals of independence of Ukraine: sociological dimensions","authors":"N. Chernysh, M. Boretska","doi":"10.15407/socium2021.03.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper offers an attempt of theoretical conceptualisation of coevals’ values of independence of Ukraine, as well as carries out the approbation of the put forward theoretical positions in empirical studies with the participation of authors. Coevals of independence are the oldest age cohort of the generation born in free Ukraine, and the central line-forming concept is the concept of “generational values”. The authors emphasised that in the multiparadigmality of modern sociology, it is methodologically expedient to develop several variants of “generational values” concepts following the main lines of sociological theorising, each of which provides appropriate empirical research methods. Paper considers four possible research schemes of these concepts in the framework of the “first”, “second”, “third” sociology (based on the works of G. Zborovsky and P. Sztompka), and a scheme based on the work of K. Mannheim is singled out. Semantic modelling of the “generational values” concept of using the axiological core of the “first” sociology (or neoclassical, objectivist) metaparadigm of sociological theorising with the appropriate method of quantitative empirical research. This allowed testing the theoretical provisions of this concept in the development of methods and empirical research with the authors’ participation and a comparative analysis of sociological information with databases of the World and European Values Surveys 2020 (particularly in Ukraine). The common and distinctive features of axiological spaces of respondents aged 29–30 in the global, European, and local context are determined, the specifics of the axiological system of the older age cohort (coevals) of the generation born in 1991–1992 are revealed to emphasise the peculiarities of the value spaces of Ukraine’s independence coevals, first of all, in relation to the ratio of materialist and postmaterialist values. The general conclusion is the recorded ambivalence of the axiological space of thirty-year-old respondents with barely noticeable shifts towards the older generations in the context of the prevailing trend of transition to post-materialist values.","PeriodicalId":436487,"journal":{"name":"Ukrainian Society","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrainian Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/socium2021.03.034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper offers an attempt of theoretical conceptualisation of coevals’ values of independence of Ukraine, as well as carries out the approbation of the put forward theoretical positions in empirical studies with the participation of authors. Coevals of independence are the oldest age cohort of the generation born in free Ukraine, and the central line-forming concept is the concept of “generational values”. The authors emphasised that in the multiparadigmality of modern sociology, it is methodologically expedient to develop several variants of “generational values” concepts following the main lines of sociological theorising, each of which provides appropriate empirical research methods. Paper considers four possible research schemes of these concepts in the framework of the “first”, “second”, “third” sociology (based on the works of G. Zborovsky and P. Sztompka), and a scheme based on the work of K. Mannheim is singled out. Semantic modelling of the “generational values” concept of using the axiological core of the “first” sociology (or neoclassical, objectivist) metaparadigm of sociological theorising with the appropriate method of quantitative empirical research. This allowed testing the theoretical provisions of this concept in the development of methods and empirical research with the authors’ participation and a comparative analysis of sociological information with databases of the World and European Values Surveys 2020 (particularly in Ukraine). The common and distinctive features of axiological spaces of respondents aged 29–30 in the global, European, and local context are determined, the specifics of the axiological system of the older age cohort (coevals) of the generation born in 1991–1992 are revealed to emphasise the peculiarities of the value spaces of Ukraine’s independence coevals, first of all, in relation to the ratio of materialist and postmaterialist values. The general conclusion is the recorded ambivalence of the axiological space of thirty-year-old respondents with barely noticeable shifts towards the older generations in the context of the prevailing trend of transition to post-materialist values.
乌克兰独立价值的价值论空间:社会学维度
本文对乌克兰独立价值观进行了理论概念化的尝试,并在作者参与的实证研究中对所提出的理论立场进行了认可。独立的同辈是出生在自由乌克兰的那一代人中年龄最大的一群人,形成核心界线的概念是“代沟价值”的概念。作者强调,在现代社会学的多范式性中,遵循社会学理论化的主线发展“代际价值”概念的几个变体在方法论上是权宜的,每个变体都提供了适当的实证研究方法。本文在“第一”、“第二”、“第三”社会学框架下(以G. Zborovsky和P. Sztompka的著作为基础)考虑了这些概念的四种可能的研究方案,并以K. Mannheim的著作为基础提出了一种方案。语义建模的“代际价值”概念采用价值论核心的“第一”社会学(或新古典主义、客观主义)元范式进行社会学理论化,并辅以适当的定量实证研究方法。这允许在作者参与的方法和实证研究的发展中测试这一概念的理论规定,并与2020年世界和欧洲价值观调查(特别是在乌克兰)的数据库进行社会学信息的比较分析。确定了全球,欧洲和当地背景下29-30岁受访者的价值空间的共同和独特特征,揭示了1991-1992年出生的一代的老年队列(同伴)的价值系统的细节,以强调乌克兰独立同伴的价值空间的特殊性,首先,与唯物主义和后唯物主义价值观的比例有关。总的结论是,在向后唯物主义价值观过渡的主流趋势背景下,30岁受访者的价值论空间的矛盾心理几乎没有明显的向老一代的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信