A Stacking Framework for Multi-Classification of Alzheimer's Disease Using Neuroimaging and Clinical Features.

Durong Chen, Fuliang Yi, Yao Qin, Jiajia Zhang, Xiaoyan Ge, Hongjuan Han, Jing Cui, Wenlin Bai, Yan Wu, Hongmei Yu
{"title":"A Stacking Framework for Multi-Classification of Alzheimer's Disease Using Neuroimaging and Clinical Features.","authors":"Durong Chen, Fuliang Yi, Yao Qin, Jiajia Zhang, Xiaoyan Ge, Hongjuan Han, Jing Cui, Wenlin Bai, Yan Wu, Hongmei Yu","doi":"10.3233/jad-215654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nAlzheimer's disease (AD) is a severe health problem. Challenges still remain in early diagnosis.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nThe objective of this study was to build a Stacking framework for multi-classification of AD by a combination of neuroimaging and clinical features to improve the performance.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThe data we used were from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database with a total of 493 subjects, including 125 normal control (NC), 121 early mild cognitive impairment, 109 late mild cognitive impairment (LMCI), and 138 AD. We selected structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) features by voting strategy. The imaging features, demographic information, Mini-Mental State Examination, and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale were combined together as classification features. We proposed a two-layer Stacking ensemble framework to classify four types of people. The first layer represented support vector machine, random forests, adaptive boosting, and gradient boosting decision tree; the second layer was a logistic regression classifier. Additionally, we analyzed performance of only sMRI feature and combined features and compared the proposed model with four base classifiers.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe Stacking model combined with sMRI and non-imaging features outshined four base classifiers with an average accuracy of 86.96% . Compared with using sMRI data alone, sMRI combined with non-imaging features significantly improved diagnostic accuracy, especially in NC versus LMCI and LMCI versus AD by 14.08% .\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe Stacking framework we used can improve performance in diagnosis of AD using combined features.","PeriodicalId":219895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-215654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

BACKGROUND Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a severe health problem. Challenges still remain in early diagnosis. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to build a Stacking framework for multi-classification of AD by a combination of neuroimaging and clinical features to improve the performance. METHODS The data we used were from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database with a total of 493 subjects, including 125 normal control (NC), 121 early mild cognitive impairment, 109 late mild cognitive impairment (LMCI), and 138 AD. We selected structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) features by voting strategy. The imaging features, demographic information, Mini-Mental State Examination, and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale were combined together as classification features. We proposed a two-layer Stacking ensemble framework to classify four types of people. The first layer represented support vector machine, random forests, adaptive boosting, and gradient boosting decision tree; the second layer was a logistic regression classifier. Additionally, we analyzed performance of only sMRI feature and combined features and compared the proposed model with four base classifiers. RESULTS The Stacking model combined with sMRI and non-imaging features outshined four base classifiers with an average accuracy of 86.96% . Compared with using sMRI data alone, sMRI combined with non-imaging features significantly improved diagnostic accuracy, especially in NC versus LMCI and LMCI versus AD by 14.08% . CONCLUSION The Stacking framework we used can improve performance in diagnosis of AD using combined features.
基于神经影像学和临床特征的阿尔茨海默病多分类堆叠框架。
阿尔茨海默病(AD)是一种严重的健康问题。在早期诊断方面仍然存在挑战。目的通过神经影像学与临床特征的结合,建立AD多重分类的堆叠框架,以提高评分。方法我们使用的数据来自阿尔茨海默病神经影像学倡议数据库,共有493名受试者,其中包括125名正常对照组(NC), 121名早期轻度认知障碍,109名晚期轻度认知障碍(LMCI)和138名AD。我们通过投票策略选择结构磁共振成像(sMRI)特征。影像学特征、人口学信息、简易精神状态检查和阿尔茨海默病评估量表-认知亚量表合并作为分类特征。我们提出了一个双层堆叠集成框架来对四种类型的人进行分类。第一层代表支持向量机、随机森林、自适应增强和梯度增强决策树;第二层是逻辑回归分类器。此外,我们分析了仅sMRI特征和组合特征的性能,并将所提出的模型与四种基本分类器进行了比较。结果结合sMRI和非成像特征的叠加模型优于4种基本分类器,平均准确率为86.96%。与单独使用sMRI数据相比,sMRI结合非成像特征显著提高了诊断准确率,特别是NC与LMCI和LMCI与AD的诊断准确率提高了14.08%。结论我们使用的叠加框架可以提高综合特征诊断AD的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信