Turkish Validity and Reliability of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale

Hilal Tüzer, V. Kocatepe, Tuba Yılmazer, B. Inkaya, Vesile Ünver, T. Levett-Jones
{"title":"Turkish Validity and Reliability of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale","authors":"Hilal Tüzer, V. Kocatepe, Tuba Yılmazer, B. Inkaya, Vesile Ünver, T. Levett-Jones","doi":"10.18521/ktd.1086313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Research on simulation-based experience focuses primarily on the student's level of knowledge, skills, self-confidence, and satisfaction. There is only one scale in Turkish that can be used to measure satisfaction with the simulation experience. The aim of this study was to establish the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale (SSES). \nMethods: The study sample consisted of 130 nursing students from two universities. Data were collected using a student information form, the Turkish version of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale (SSES-TR) and the Scale of Student Satisfaction and Confidence in Learning (SSSCL). The original SSES was translated into Turkish. Thirteen academics, who were experts in nursing and simulation, were consulted for content validity. Expert feedback was collected in a form to determine the content validity ratio using Lawshe's technique. The Turkish adaptation of the SSES was performed by four linguists to ensure linguistic validity. The correlation between the SSES-TR and SSSCL was determined using concurrent validity and Pearson’s Correlation. Internal consistency tests were used to test reliability. The SSES-TR was administered to 35 students as a test-retest with an interval of two weeks to determine its consistency across time. \nResults: The SSES-TR had a Cronbach’s alpha (α) of 0.928. The correlation between SSES-TR items and total and subscale scores ranged from 0.492 to 0.749. Test-retest reliability coefficients showed that the SSES-TR total score and subscale scores were compatible. \nConclusion: The SSES-TR is a reliable and valid measure that can be used to assess nursing students’ satisfaction with simulation-based experience.","PeriodicalId":174708,"journal":{"name":"Konuralp Tıp Dergisi","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Konuralp Tıp Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18521/ktd.1086313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Research on simulation-based experience focuses primarily on the student's level of knowledge, skills, self-confidence, and satisfaction. There is only one scale in Turkish that can be used to measure satisfaction with the simulation experience. The aim of this study was to establish the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale (SSES). Methods: The study sample consisted of 130 nursing students from two universities. Data were collected using a student information form, the Turkish version of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale (SSES-TR) and the Scale of Student Satisfaction and Confidence in Learning (SSSCL). The original SSES was translated into Turkish. Thirteen academics, who were experts in nursing and simulation, were consulted for content validity. Expert feedback was collected in a form to determine the content validity ratio using Lawshe's technique. The Turkish adaptation of the SSES was performed by four linguists to ensure linguistic validity. The correlation between the SSES-TR and SSSCL was determined using concurrent validity and Pearson’s Correlation. Internal consistency tests were used to test reliability. The SSES-TR was administered to 35 students as a test-retest with an interval of two weeks to determine its consistency across time. Results: The SSES-TR had a Cronbach’s alpha (α) of 0.928. The correlation between SSES-TR items and total and subscale scores ranged from 0.492 to 0.749. Test-retest reliability coefficients showed that the SSES-TR total score and subscale scores were compatible. Conclusion: The SSES-TR is a reliable and valid measure that can be used to assess nursing students’ satisfaction with simulation-based experience.
土耳其语模拟体验满意度量表的效度和信度
目的:模拟体验的研究主要关注学生的知识水平、技能水平、自信心和满意度。在土耳其,只有一个量表可以用来衡量对模拟体验的满意度。本研究的目的是建立土耳其版模拟体验满意度量表(ses)的效度和信度。方法:研究对象为两所大学130名护生。使用学生信息表、土耳其版模拟体验满意度量表(SSES-TR)和学生满意度和学习信心量表(SSSCL)收集数据。最初的《社会主义社会》被翻译成土耳其语。13名学者,谁是专家护理和模拟,咨询内容效度。采用Lawshe技术收集专家反馈意见,确定内容效度比。为确保语言的有效性,四位语言学家对《社会主义社会量表》进行了土耳其语改编。SSES-TR与SSSCL的相关性采用并发效度和Pearson相关来确定。使用内部一致性测试来测试信度。对35名学生进行复试,每隔两周进行一次复试,以确定其在时间上的一致性。结果:SSES-TR的Cronbach’s alpha (α)为0.928。SSES-TR项目与总分和子量表得分的相关系数为0.492 ~ 0.749。重测信度系数显示,sess - tr总分与分量表得分具有一致性。结论:SSES-TR是一种可靠、有效的评估护生模拟体验满意度的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信