Ethics in Banks’ Publicly Accessible Documents: The Case of Slovenia

Maja Tihole, S. Beloglavec
{"title":"Ethics in Banks’ Publicly Accessible Documents: The Case of Slovenia","authors":"Maja Tihole, S. Beloglavec","doi":"10.26417/EJME.V1I3.P21-31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article focuses on ethics being mentioned and addressed to in banks’ publicly accessible documents in Slovenian banking system. Authors in the first part deal with the question, whether a bank as a financial institution can be ethical as such, taking the responsibility for formation and development in the recent financial crisis into consideration. However, ethics in banking refers to ethical behaviour and activities at all levels of banking operations: from back office to front office, bank’s policies and strategies, and nevertheless, banks’ influence and involvement in the community. Such banks provide financing for projects and scholarships, sponsor events, promote environmental protection and similar activities described as socially responsible banking. Socially responsible banks can by all means act ethically. Our research is geographically wise limited to the banking system of Slovenia and content wise by looking merely into the fact whether or not ethics and ethical principles are present in Slovenian banking system and being a subject of banks’ reporting. We do not place a judgment about individual bank or banking system behaviour regarding ethics. The research is fully based on the presumption that information held in annual reports and other publicly accessible sources are correct and honest. In that context we set and tested two hypotheses. First (H1), being divided into two sub hypotheses, deals with the presence of ethics and ethical activities (H1a) and definition of ethical bank behaviour in banks’ publicly accessible documents (H2a) and second (H2) tests, whether banks in Slovenian banking system have ethical codes. We have accepted H1a and H2 and partly accepted H1b.","PeriodicalId":409185,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Marketing and Economics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Marketing and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26417/EJME.V1I3.P21-31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article focuses on ethics being mentioned and addressed to in banks’ publicly accessible documents in Slovenian banking system. Authors in the first part deal with the question, whether a bank as a financial institution can be ethical as such, taking the responsibility for formation and development in the recent financial crisis into consideration. However, ethics in banking refers to ethical behaviour and activities at all levels of banking operations: from back office to front office, bank’s policies and strategies, and nevertheless, banks’ influence and involvement in the community. Such banks provide financing for projects and scholarships, sponsor events, promote environmental protection and similar activities described as socially responsible banking. Socially responsible banks can by all means act ethically. Our research is geographically wise limited to the banking system of Slovenia and content wise by looking merely into the fact whether or not ethics and ethical principles are present in Slovenian banking system and being a subject of banks’ reporting. We do not place a judgment about individual bank or banking system behaviour regarding ethics. The research is fully based on the presumption that information held in annual reports and other publicly accessible sources are correct and honest. In that context we set and tested two hypotheses. First (H1), being divided into two sub hypotheses, deals with the presence of ethics and ethical activities (H1a) and definition of ethical bank behaviour in banks’ publicly accessible documents (H2a) and second (H2) tests, whether banks in Slovenian banking system have ethical codes. We have accepted H1a and H2 and partly accepted H1b.
银行公开文件中的道德规范:斯洛文尼亚案例
本文的重点是在斯洛文尼亚银行系统的银行公开文件中提到和解决的道德问题。第一部分从银行作为金融机构的形成和发展的责任出发,探讨了银行作为金融机构是否具有伦理道德的问题。然而,银行业道德是指银行业务各个层面的道德行为和活动:从后台到前台,银行的政策和战略,以及银行对社会的影响和参与。这些银行为项目和奖学金提供融资,赞助活动,促进环境保护和类似的被称为社会责任银行的活动。对社会负责的银行可以不择手段地按照道德行事。我们的研究在地理上是明智的,仅限于斯洛文尼亚的银行系统和内容明智的,通过仅仅观察斯洛文尼亚银行系统中是否存在道德和道德原则这一事实,并成为银行报告的主题。我们不会对个别银行或银行体系在道德方面的行为作出判断。这项研究完全基于这样一种假设,即年度报告和其他可公开获取的信息是正确和诚实的。在这种背景下,我们设定并检验了两个假设。第一(H1),被分为两个子假设,涉及道德和道德活动的存在(H1a)和银行公开可访问文件(H2a)中道德银行行为的定义,第二(H2)测试,斯洛文尼亚银行体系中的银行是否有道德准则。我们已经接受了H1a和H2,部分接受了H1b
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信