Comparison of cannulated screw, tension band, and mini-fragment t-plate fixation in medial malleolus fractures

İsmail Güzel, S. Akpancar
{"title":"Comparison of cannulated screw, tension band, and mini-fragment t-plate fixation in medial malleolus fractures","authors":"İsmail Güzel, S. Akpancar","doi":"10.58651/jomtu.1325159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The study aimed to compare the clinical results of cannulated screw (KS), tension band, and mini-fragment T-plate (MTP) fixation in medial malleolus fractures. \nMaterials and Methods: The present study employed a retrospective cohort design to investigate the outcomes of patients who underwent treatment for medial malleolus fractures at our clinic between January 2016 and January 2019. A total of 90 patients were included in the study, and they received one of three fixation methods: cannulated screw, tension band, or mini-fragment T-plate. The evaluation of ankle and foot functions was conducted using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Surgery score, number of fluoroscopy shots, duration of surgery, and ankle joint range of motion measurements. \nResults: After a 12-month follow-up, there was no significant difference between the groups (p=0,263, p=0,432 and P=0,376) in terms of the AOFAS score. The ankle joint range of motion was similar in all groups. According to the radiographs, the compression ability was weaker in the mini-plate group than in the other groups. The mean duration of surgery was shorter in the cannulated screw group (p","PeriodicalId":417223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Topics and Updates","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Topics and Updates","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58651/jomtu.1325159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The study aimed to compare the clinical results of cannulated screw (KS), tension band, and mini-fragment T-plate (MTP) fixation in medial malleolus fractures. Materials and Methods: The present study employed a retrospective cohort design to investigate the outcomes of patients who underwent treatment for medial malleolus fractures at our clinic between January 2016 and January 2019. A total of 90 patients were included in the study, and they received one of three fixation methods: cannulated screw, tension band, or mini-fragment T-plate. The evaluation of ankle and foot functions was conducted using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Surgery score, number of fluoroscopy shots, duration of surgery, and ankle joint range of motion measurements. Results: After a 12-month follow-up, there was no significant difference between the groups (p=0,263, p=0,432 and P=0,376) in terms of the AOFAS score. The ankle joint range of motion was similar in all groups. According to the radiographs, the compression ability was weaker in the mini-plate group than in the other groups. The mean duration of surgery was shorter in the cannulated screw group (p
空心螺钉、张力带和小碎片t型钢板内固定治疗内踝骨折的比较
背景:本研究旨在比较空心螺钉(KS)、张力带和微型碎片t型钢板(MTP)固定治疗内踝骨折的临床效果。材料与方法:本研究采用回顾性队列设计,调查2016年1月至2019年1月在我诊所接受内踝骨折治疗的患者的预后。该研究共纳入90例患者,他们接受了三种固定方法中的一种:空心螺钉、张力带或微型碎片t型钢板。踝关节和足部功能的评估采用American Orthopedic foot and ankle Surgery评分、透视次数、手术时间和踝关节活动范围测量。结果:随访12个月后,两组患者的AOFAS评分差异无统计学意义(p=0,263, p=0,432, p= 0,376)。各组踝关节活动范围相似。x线片显示,微型钢板组的加压能力弱于其他组。空心螺钉组的平均手术时间较短(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信