Differences of Spermatozoa Concentration Analysis Between Manual and Automatic Methods

Emma Ismawatie, Purwanto Adhipireno, Seso Sulijaya Suyono, E. Purwanto, Budi Santoso, E. K. S. Limijadi
{"title":"Differences of Spermatozoa Concentration Analysis Between Manual and Automatic Methods","authors":"Emma Ismawatie, Purwanto Adhipireno, Seso Sulijaya Suyono, E. Purwanto, Budi Santoso, E. K. S. Limijadi","doi":"10.33086/ijmlst.v3i2.1961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The examination of sperm concentration in the laboratory is the calculation of the number and motility using a microscope or using a device. There are still some clinicians who doubt the accuracy of the sperm count results using a semen analyzer rather than using the manual method. This study aims is to determine the differences of the sperm concentration examination between the manual method and the automatic method. Subjects in this study were patients who carried out semen analysis tests at the Clinical Pathology Laboratory of RSIA \"Restu Ibu\" Sragen from June to August 2020. The object of this research is the examination of sperm concentration, using a manual method using a hemocytometer and an automatic method using the LensHooke ™ SQA X1 Pro. The results of statistical tests using the Mann Whitney methods show that the significance value (p) was 0.960, which means that there was no difference in the results of  the sperm concentration examination between the manual method and the automatic method. Result of this research shows that there is no weakness or significant difference if compared between manual and automatic methods.","PeriodicalId":158539,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Medical Laboratory Science and Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Medical Laboratory Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33086/ijmlst.v3i2.1961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The examination of sperm concentration in the laboratory is the calculation of the number and motility using a microscope or using a device. There are still some clinicians who doubt the accuracy of the sperm count results using a semen analyzer rather than using the manual method. This study aims is to determine the differences of the sperm concentration examination between the manual method and the automatic method. Subjects in this study were patients who carried out semen analysis tests at the Clinical Pathology Laboratory of RSIA "Restu Ibu" Sragen from June to August 2020. The object of this research is the examination of sperm concentration, using a manual method using a hemocytometer and an automatic method using the LensHooke ™ SQA X1 Pro. The results of statistical tests using the Mann Whitney methods show that the significance value (p) was 0.960, which means that there was no difference in the results of  the sperm concentration examination between the manual method and the automatic method. Result of this research shows that there is no weakness or significant difference if compared between manual and automatic methods.
人工与自动精子浓度分析方法的差异
实验室中精子浓度的检查是用显微镜或仪器计算精子的数量和活力。仍然有一些临床医生怀疑使用精液分析仪而不是使用人工方法的精子计数结果的准确性。本研究旨在确定人工方法与自动方法在精子浓度检测中的差异。本研究的对象是于2020年6月至8月在RSIA“Restu Ibu”Sragen临床病理实验室进行精液分析测试的患者。本研究的目的是检测精子浓度,使用手工方法使用血细胞计和自动方法使用LensHooke™SQA X1 Pro。采用Mann Whitney方法进行统计检验的结果显示,显著性值(p)为0.960,即手工方法与自动方法的精子浓度检查结果无差异。本研究结果表明,手动方法与自动方法相比,没有缺点,也没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信