The Rhetorical Structure of Literature Reviews in Egyptian-Authored English Research Articles in Linguistics

Hend Rabie, Deena Boraie
{"title":"The Rhetorical Structure of Literature Reviews in Egyptian-Authored English Research Articles in Linguistics","authors":"Hend Rabie, Deena Boraie","doi":"10.37698/ASHREJ.V3I1.63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present paper seeks to examine the rhetorical structure of the literature review (LR) sections of English research articles (RAs) written by Egyptian researchers in the field of linguistics. For this purpose, a sample of ten LRs was selected from RAs published in local and international English-medium journals in linguistics between 2013 and 2019. The study deployed hybrid techniques and approaches for data collection (random/non-random sampling) and data analysis (genre-based/corpus-driven and qualitative/quantitative). Findings showed rhetorical variation in the LRs written by both groups, especially concerning Move 2 and Move 3 that were used more frequently in the international sample than in the local one, where the focus was on Move 1. In addition, some new steps emerged. The findings also shed light on the problems within the rhetorical structure of the LRs published locally, implying that the lack of rhetorical knowledge is one of the major reasons that hinder writing professional LRs. This paper contributes to a better understanding of the generic structure of RA LRs by proposing a modified version of Kwan's (2006) model. It has pedagogical implications for teaching Egyptian and apprentice researchers how to write more effective RA LRs. Future studies on a larger corpus of complete RAs written by Egyptian and international researchers in soft and hard sciences are needed to provide more generalizable findings.","PeriodicalId":146510,"journal":{"name":"Asian Social Science and Humanities Research Journal (ASHREJ)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Social Science and Humanities Research Journal (ASHREJ)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37698/ASHREJ.V3I1.63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The present paper seeks to examine the rhetorical structure of the literature review (LR) sections of English research articles (RAs) written by Egyptian researchers in the field of linguistics. For this purpose, a sample of ten LRs was selected from RAs published in local and international English-medium journals in linguistics between 2013 and 2019. The study deployed hybrid techniques and approaches for data collection (random/non-random sampling) and data analysis (genre-based/corpus-driven and qualitative/quantitative). Findings showed rhetorical variation in the LRs written by both groups, especially concerning Move 2 and Move 3 that were used more frequently in the international sample than in the local one, where the focus was on Move 1. In addition, some new steps emerged. The findings also shed light on the problems within the rhetorical structure of the LRs published locally, implying that the lack of rhetorical knowledge is one of the major reasons that hinder writing professional LRs. This paper contributes to a better understanding of the generic structure of RA LRs by proposing a modified version of Kwan's (2006) model. It has pedagogical implications for teaching Egyptian and apprentice researchers how to write more effective RA LRs. Future studies on a larger corpus of complete RAs written by Egyptian and international researchers in soft and hard sciences are needed to provide more generalizable findings.
埃及人撰写的英语语言学研究论文中文献评论的修辞结构
本文旨在研究埃及研究人员在语言学领域撰写的英语研究文章(RAs)的文献综述(LR)部分的修辞结构。为此,从2013年至2019年在本地和国际英语语言期刊上发表的RAs中选择了10个LRs样本。该研究采用了数据收集(随机/非随机抽样)和数据分析(基于类型/语料库驱动和定性/定量)的混合技术和方法。研究结果显示,两组人所写的LRs在修辞上存在差异,尤其是在第2步和第3步上,这两步在国际样本中比在当地样本中使用得更频繁,而当地样本的重点是第1步。此外,还出现了一些新的步骤。研究结果还揭示了本地出版的LRs的修辞结构问题,这意味着缺乏修辞知识是阻碍专业LRs写作的主要原因之一。本文通过提出Kwan(2006)模型的修改版本,有助于更好地理解RA LRs的一般结构。它对教授埃及和学徒研究人员如何编写更有效的RA LRs具有教学意义。未来需要对埃及和国际软科学和硬科学研究人员撰写的更大的完整RAs语料库进行研究,以提供更普遍的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信