Students’ Evaluation Toward Online Teaching Strategies for Engineering Courses during COVID

F. Yu, J. Milord, Sarah Orton, Lisa Flores, R. Marra
{"title":"Students’ Evaluation Toward Online Teaching Strategies for Engineering Courses during COVID","authors":"F. Yu, J. Milord, Sarah Orton, Lisa Flores, R. Marra","doi":"10.18260/1-2-1153-38345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extended Abstract As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, courses at various educational institutions were suddenly migrated online in the Spring 2020 semester. For many of the instructors, this was their first experience teaching engineering courses virtually. Instructors applied a range of online teaching strategies to assist students in learning better. The purpose of this study was to gather student feedback on different teaching methods and uncover whether or not these approaches were used or were found to be supportive by the students. Our findings can benefit instructors of engineering courses in improving or changing their teaching methods in order to enable students to adjust to remote learning better. The research team administered surveys during the final two weeks in the semester of Spring 2020. One hundred nineteen participants answered a series of closed questions related to the instructors’ teaching strategies across 8 different engineering courses (Table 1). Specifically, based on the question “ What things did your instructor do that was helpful for learning online ,” participants assessed whether instructors’ teaching strategies were helpful or not. The criteria for evaluation were Not Helpful, Slightly Helpful, Somewhat Helpful, Helpful, Very Helpful, and N/A . N/A means the instructor did not use this strategy. Our findings suggested that teaching strategies made students feel supported and indicated that discussion forums, flexible deadlines, and clear expectations were among the helpful. Fan Yu is a doctoral of Information Science and Learning Technologies Fan received her MS in Elementary Education Science and a graduate certificate in Curriculum and Instructions. Fan’s research interests include STEM education and UX design in learning technologies. She concerns about how learning technologies encourage students from underrepresented groups to study and work in STEM fields.","PeriodicalId":280607,"journal":{"name":"2021 ASEE Midwest Section Conference Proceedings","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 ASEE Midwest Section Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-1153-38345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extended Abstract As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, courses at various educational institutions were suddenly migrated online in the Spring 2020 semester. For many of the instructors, this was their first experience teaching engineering courses virtually. Instructors applied a range of online teaching strategies to assist students in learning better. The purpose of this study was to gather student feedback on different teaching methods and uncover whether or not these approaches were used or were found to be supportive by the students. Our findings can benefit instructors of engineering courses in improving or changing their teaching methods in order to enable students to adjust to remote learning better. The research team administered surveys during the final two weeks in the semester of Spring 2020. One hundred nineteen participants answered a series of closed questions related to the instructors’ teaching strategies across 8 different engineering courses (Table 1). Specifically, based on the question “ What things did your instructor do that was helpful for learning online ,” participants assessed whether instructors’ teaching strategies were helpful or not. The criteria for evaluation were Not Helpful, Slightly Helpful, Somewhat Helpful, Helpful, Very Helpful, and N/A . N/A means the instructor did not use this strategy. Our findings suggested that teaching strategies made students feel supported and indicated that discussion forums, flexible deadlines, and clear expectations were among the helpful. Fan Yu is a doctoral of Information Science and Learning Technologies Fan received her MS in Elementary Education Science and a graduate certificate in Curriculum and Instructions. Fan’s research interests include STEM education and UX design in learning technologies. She concerns about how learning technologies encourage students from underrepresented groups to study and work in STEM fields.
新冠肺炎期间学生对工程课程在线教学策略的评价
由于2019冠状病毒病大流行,各教育机构的课程在2020年春季学期突然迁移到网上。对许多教师来说,这是他们第一次体验以虚拟方式教授工程课程。教师采用了一系列在线教学策略来帮助学生更好地学习。本研究的目的是收集学生对不同教学方法的反馈,并揭示这些方法是否被学生使用或被学生发现是支持的。我们的研究结果可以帮助工程课程的教师改进或改变他们的教学方法,以使学生更好地适应远程学习。研究小组在2020年春季学期的最后两周进行了调查。119名参与者回答了一系列与8门不同工程课程的教师教学策略相关的封闭式问题(表1)。具体而言,基于“您的教师做了哪些有助于在线学习的事情”这一问题,参与者评估了教师的教学策略是否有用。评估标准为“没有帮助”、“稍微有帮助”、“有点帮助”、“有帮助”、“非常有帮助”和“不知道”。N/A表示教师没有使用这种策略。我们的研究结果表明,教学策略使学生感到被支持,并表明讨论论坛、灵活的截止日期和明确的期望是有帮助的。范宇,信息科学与学习技术博士,获得基础教育科学硕士学位和课程与教学研究生证书。范的研究兴趣包括STEM教育和学习技术中的用户体验设计。她关注学习技术如何鼓励来自代表性不足群体的学生在STEM领域学习和工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信