Application of Functional Resonance Analysis Method and System-Theoretic Accident Model and Processes approaches combined with other methods

Alimeh Mofidi Naeini, S. Nadeau
{"title":"Application of Functional Resonance Analysis Method and System-Theoretic Accident Model and Processes approaches combined with other methods","authors":"Alimeh Mofidi Naeini, S. Nadeau","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1002190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When dealing with risks associated with complex sociotechnical systems, one needs to employ approaches that will make it possible to better understand the systems' complexity and analyze them more efficiently. Several approaches have been proposed and in the recent literature, the System-Theoretic Accident Model and Processes (STAMP) and Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) stand out. These have been applied both separately and integrated with other methods for risk analysis. This study aims to provide an overview of the literature related to the application of FRAM and STAMP integrated with other methods. Papers from various scientific resources, including Scopus, IEEE, Compendex and INSPEC, Google Scholar, and Espace ÉTS from 2004 to 2021, in English, were consulted. The keywords used to narrow our search were FRAM, STAMP, STPA, and risk analysis. The results show that FRAM and STAMP have been used in combination with other methods such as fuzzy logic, Monte Carlo Simulation, bow tie, and model checking. Their combination with other methods has enhanced their efficiency and capability in risk analysis and provides better and more precise outcomes for some specific contexts of study. These combined proposed approaches have been applied and validated for specific contexts in specific studies. Therefore, the generalization and validation of the combined methods in different contexts could be an outlook for future studies.","PeriodicalId":402751,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors and Systems Interaction","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors and Systems Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1002190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

When dealing with risks associated with complex sociotechnical systems, one needs to employ approaches that will make it possible to better understand the systems' complexity and analyze them more efficiently. Several approaches have been proposed and in the recent literature, the System-Theoretic Accident Model and Processes (STAMP) and Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) stand out. These have been applied both separately and integrated with other methods for risk analysis. This study aims to provide an overview of the literature related to the application of FRAM and STAMP integrated with other methods. Papers from various scientific resources, including Scopus, IEEE, Compendex and INSPEC, Google Scholar, and Espace ÉTS from 2004 to 2021, in English, were consulted. The keywords used to narrow our search were FRAM, STAMP, STPA, and risk analysis. The results show that FRAM and STAMP have been used in combination with other methods such as fuzzy logic, Monte Carlo Simulation, bow tie, and model checking. Their combination with other methods has enhanced their efficiency and capability in risk analysis and provides better and more precise outcomes for some specific contexts of study. These combined proposed approaches have been applied and validated for specific contexts in specific studies. Therefore, the generalization and validation of the combined methods in different contexts could be an outlook for future studies.
功能共振分析方法和系统理论事故模型及过程方法与其他方法结合的应用
当处理与复杂社会技术系统相关的风险时,需要采用能够更好地理解系统复杂性并更有效地分析它们的方法。已经提出了几种方法,在最近的文献中,系统理论事故模型和过程(STAMP)和功能共振分析方法(FRAM)脱颖而出。这些方法既可以单独应用,也可以与其他风险分析方法结合使用。本研究旨在对FRAM和STAMP结合其他方法应用的相关文献进行综述。查阅了2004年至2021年间来自Scopus、IEEE、Compendex和INSPEC、谷歌Scholar和Espace ÉTS等各种科学资源的英文论文。用于缩小搜索范围的关键词是FRAM、STAMP、STPA和风险分析。结果表明,FRAM和STAMP可以与模糊逻辑、蒙特卡罗仿真、领结和模型检验等方法相结合。它们与其他方法的结合提高了风险分析的效率和能力,并为某些特定的研究情境提供了更好、更精确的结果。这些联合提出的方法已在具体研究的具体背景下得到应用和验证。因此,在不同背景下对组合方法的推广和验证可能是未来研究的一个前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信