Usability evaluation of ambient assisted living systems using a multi-method approach

A. Martins, A. Queirós, A. Silva, N. Rocha
{"title":"Usability evaluation of ambient assisted living systems using a multi-method approach","authors":"A. Martins, A. Queirós, A. Silva, N. Rocha","doi":"10.1145/3019943.3019981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background -- The assessment of the usability of Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) products and services is a demanding process due to their complexity. Objective -- To verify the feasibility of using a multi-method approach for data collection when evaluating the usability of AAL products and services. Methods -- An experimental study was conducted using two questionnaires, the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ) and the International Classification of Functionality, Disability and Health based Usability Scale (ICF-US), together with the registration of quantitative data related to the performance of the users carrying out specific tasks, and the registration of critical incidents. Results -- The experimental results suggest that the PSSUQ (to determine self-perceived usability) and the ICF-US (to determine the opinion of the evaluator on the users' performance) promote an accurate evaluation of the interaction mechanisms. Conclusion -- Multiple data collection methods seems to be an efficient approach for usability evaluation of AAL products and services.","PeriodicalId":334897,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion","volume":"180 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3019943.3019981","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background -- The assessment of the usability of Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) products and services is a demanding process due to their complexity. Objective -- To verify the feasibility of using a multi-method approach for data collection when evaluating the usability of AAL products and services. Methods -- An experimental study was conducted using two questionnaires, the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ) and the International Classification of Functionality, Disability and Health based Usability Scale (ICF-US), together with the registration of quantitative data related to the performance of the users carrying out specific tasks, and the registration of critical incidents. Results -- The experimental results suggest that the PSSUQ (to determine self-perceived usability) and the ICF-US (to determine the opinion of the evaluator on the users' performance) promote an accurate evaluation of the interaction mechanisms. Conclusion -- Multiple data collection methods seems to be an efficient approach for usability evaluation of AAL products and services.
使用多方法评估环境辅助生活系统的可用性
环境辅助生活(AAL)产品和服务的可用性评估由于其复杂性是一个苛刻的过程。目的-验证在评估AAL产品和服务的可用性时使用多方法收集数据的可行性。方法:采用研究后系统可用性问卷(PSSUQ)和基于功能、残疾和健康的国际分类可用性量表(ICF-US)两份问卷进行实验研究,同时注册与用户执行特定任务的表现相关的定量数据,并注册关键事件。结果-实验结果表明,PSSUQ(确定自我感知可用性)和ICF-US(确定评估者对用户表现的意见)促进了对交互机制的准确评估。结论——多种数据收集方法似乎是AAL产品和服务可用性评估的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信