The judgment of Arendt

Rita A. Gardiner, Katy Fulfer
{"title":"The judgment of Arendt","authors":"Rita A. Gardiner, Katy Fulfer","doi":"10.4337/9781839104107.00009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The political philosopher Hannah Arendt argued that judgment is a vital component of human deliberation, enriching understanding and enhancing decision-making abilities. In this chapter, we explore her approach to judgment in relation to leadership and politics. After a short introduction of Arendt’s life and work, we examine how Arendt applies her ideas to leadership and the political realm. Next, we examine how she conceptualizes judgment, connecting her approach with the work of leadership scholars who view judgment as a form of practical wisdom. Then, we explore how an Arendtian approach to judgment offers insight into contemporary political events related to COVID-19. Specifically, we examine the conflicting opinions, and sometimes violent responses, to political orders mandating mask-wearing in public. In the concluding section, we explore how Arendtian judgment provides an additional contribution that may help scholars further understand the interconnections among leadership, judgment, and complex issues. © Anna B. Kayes and D. Christopher Kayes 2021.","PeriodicalId":244468,"journal":{"name":"Judgment and Leadership","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judgment and Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839104107.00009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The political philosopher Hannah Arendt argued that judgment is a vital component of human deliberation, enriching understanding and enhancing decision-making abilities. In this chapter, we explore her approach to judgment in relation to leadership and politics. After a short introduction of Arendt’s life and work, we examine how Arendt applies her ideas to leadership and the political realm. Next, we examine how she conceptualizes judgment, connecting her approach with the work of leadership scholars who view judgment as a form of practical wisdom. Then, we explore how an Arendtian approach to judgment offers insight into contemporary political events related to COVID-19. Specifically, we examine the conflicting opinions, and sometimes violent responses, to political orders mandating mask-wearing in public. In the concluding section, we explore how Arendtian judgment provides an additional contribution that may help scholars further understand the interconnections among leadership, judgment, and complex issues. © Anna B. Kayes and D. Christopher Kayes 2021.
阿伦特的判断
政治哲学家汉娜·阿伦特(Hannah Arendt)认为,判断是人类深思熟虑的重要组成部分,可以丰富理解并提高决策能力。在本章中,我们探讨了她在领导和政治方面的判断方法。在简要介绍阿伦特的生活和工作之后,我们将研究阿伦特如何将她的思想应用于领导和政治领域。接下来,我们将研究她如何将判断概念化,并将她的方法与领导力学者的工作联系起来,这些学者将判断视为一种实践智慧。然后,我们探讨了阿伦特的判断方法如何为与COVID-19相关的当代政治事件提供见解。具体来说,我们研究了对强制在公共场合戴口罩的政治命令的冲突意见,有时是暴力反应。在结语部分,我们探讨了阿伦特判断如何提供了一个额外的贡献,可以帮助学者们进一步理解领导力、判断和复杂问题之间的相互联系。©Anna B. Kayes和D. Christopher Kayes 2021。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信