Inequality and Competitive Effort: The Roles of Asymmetric Resources, Opportunity and Outcomes

ERN: Equity Pub Date : 2017-07-01 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3005250
Francesco Fallucchi, Abhijit Ramalingam, B. Rockenbach, Marcin Waligora
{"title":"Inequality and Competitive Effort: The Roles of Asymmetric Resources, Opportunity and Outcomes","authors":"Francesco Fallucchi, Abhijit Ramalingam, B. Rockenbach, Marcin Waligora","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3005250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the effects of different sources of inequality in a commonplace economic interaction: competition. We investigate how individuals react to different types of inequality in experimental two-player Tullock contests where contestants expend resources to win a prize. We study three different sources of inequality: resources, abilities and possible outcomes. We find that overall competitive effort is greater in the presence of inequality in abilities than other inequalities. Unlike other forms, inequality in abilities elicits a very aggressive reaction from disadvantaged players relative to their advantaged opponents. The Quantal Response Equilibrium (QRE) suggests that financial incentives are less salient in the presence of a biased contest procedure.","PeriodicalId":282303,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Equity","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Equity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3005250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

We study the effects of different sources of inequality in a commonplace economic interaction: competition. We investigate how individuals react to different types of inequality in experimental two-player Tullock contests where contestants expend resources to win a prize. We study three different sources of inequality: resources, abilities and possible outcomes. We find that overall competitive effort is greater in the presence of inequality in abilities than other inequalities. Unlike other forms, inequality in abilities elicits a very aggressive reaction from disadvantaged players relative to their advantaged opponents. The Quantal Response Equilibrium (QRE) suggests that financial incentives are less salient in the presence of a biased contest procedure.
不平等与竞争努力:不对称资源、机会和结果的作用
我们研究了不平等的不同来源在一个常见的经济互动中的影响:竞争。我们研究了个体对不同类型的不平等的反应,在实验的双人图洛克竞赛中,参赛者花费资源来赢得奖品。我们研究了三种不同的不平等来源:资源、能力和可能的结果。我们发现,在能力不平等的情况下,总体竞争努力比其他不平等的情况下更大。与其他形式不同的是,能力的不平等会引起弱势玩家相对于优势对手的强烈反应。量子反应均衡(QRE)表明,在存在偏见的竞争过程中,财务激励不那么突出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信