The Normative Dimension of Securitization as a Strategic Crisis Communication Theory.Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic in Central & Eastern Europe

Marta Natalia Lukacovic
{"title":"The Normative Dimension of Securitization as a Strategic Crisis Communication Theory.Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic in Central & Eastern Europe","authors":"Marta Natalia Lukacovic","doi":"10.51423/2524-0471-2022-14-1-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study. This article aims to advance the development of the normative dimension of securitization as strategic crisis communication theory. Securitization is a powerful persuasive tool because it builds an argument that an existential threat is looming and extraordinary measures should be employed to counter it (Buzan et al., 1998; Vultee in Balzacq, 2010; Watson, 2012). Research methods and techniques. The theorization in this article is based on an analysis exploring a set of cases of Slovakia’s counter-pandemic measures during the first two years of the COVID-19 outbreak in the country. Results and discussion. The case study of Slovakiais informative because the instances there reflect a broader array of problems that are experienced across various global societies; for example, a failure to introduce measures that are inclusive of the marginalized people in terms of ethno-racial discrimination or digital disparities. The analysis helps to extract a set of practical recommendations that aim to craft ethically-sound securitized discourses for persuasive purposes during crises. The framework proposed by Floyd (2011; 2019) is used as the main scaffold for normative securitization and is further enhanced by the relevant ethics standards of the strategic communication field, leading to the introduced lineup of recommendations. Conclusions. The author provides recommendations for the use of securitization methods: 1) establishing the causes of securitization (determining the cause of the threat to a particular type of security; establishing a clear and transparent set of guidelines to consistently determine which frame is reasonably superior to another frame (s)); 2) taking into account the reference object of securitization (inclusion of all victims and groups; establishing a clear and transparent set of guidelines for determining the consequences of non-human entities and concepts from a regulatory point of view).Keywords:securitization, strategic crisis communication theory, normative communication theory, COVID-19 communication, pandemic communication, Slovakia","PeriodicalId":281834,"journal":{"name":"Social Communications: Theory and PracticeS","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Communications: Theory and PracticeS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51423/2524-0471-2022-14-1-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study. This article aims to advance the development of the normative dimension of securitization as strategic crisis communication theory. Securitization is a powerful persuasive tool because it builds an argument that an existential threat is looming and extraordinary measures should be employed to counter it (Buzan et al., 1998; Vultee in Balzacq, 2010; Watson, 2012). Research methods and techniques. The theorization in this article is based on an analysis exploring a set of cases of Slovakia’s counter-pandemic measures during the first two years of the COVID-19 outbreak in the country. Results and discussion. The case study of Slovakiais informative because the instances there reflect a broader array of problems that are experienced across various global societies; for example, a failure to introduce measures that are inclusive of the marginalized people in terms of ethno-racial discrimination or digital disparities. The analysis helps to extract a set of practical recommendations that aim to craft ethically-sound securitized discourses for persuasive purposes during crises. The framework proposed by Floyd (2011; 2019) is used as the main scaffold for normative securitization and is further enhanced by the relevant ethics standards of the strategic communication field, leading to the introduced lineup of recommendations. Conclusions. The author provides recommendations for the use of securitization methods: 1) establishing the causes of securitization (determining the cause of the threat to a particular type of security; establishing a clear and transparent set of guidelines to consistently determine which frame is reasonably superior to another frame (s)); 2) taking into account the reference object of securitization (inclusion of all victims and groups; establishing a clear and transparent set of guidelines for determining the consequences of non-human entities and concepts from a regulatory point of view).Keywords:securitization, strategic crisis communication theory, normative communication theory, COVID-19 communication, pandemic communication, Slovakia
作为战略危机沟通理论的证券化的规范维度。中欧和东欧COVID-19大流行的教训
研究的目的。本文旨在推动作为战略危机传播理论的证券化规范维度的发展。证券化是一种强大的说服工具,因为它建立了一个论点,即存在的威胁正在逼近,应该采取特别措施来应对它(Buzan等人,1998;巴尔扎克的Vultee, 2010;华生,2012)。研究方法和技术。本文的理论基于对斯洛伐克在2019冠状病毒病爆发的头两年采取的一系列反流行病措施的分析。结果和讨论。斯洛伐克的案例研究内容丰富,因为那里的案例反映了全球各个社会所经历的一系列更广泛的问题;例如,在民族-种族歧视或数字差距方面,未能采取包括边缘化人群的措施。分析有助于提炼出一套实用的建议,这些建议旨在在危机期间为有说服力的目的精心设计合乎道德的证券化话语。弗洛伊德(2011)提出的框架;(2019)被用作规范证券化的主要框架,并被战略传播领域的相关道德标准进一步加强,导致引入了一系列建议。结论。作者对证券化方法的使用提出了建议:1)确定证券化的原因(确定特定类型的证券受到威胁的原因;建立一套清晰和透明的指导方针,以一致地确定哪个框架比另一个框架合理地优越;2)考虑到证券化的参考对象(包括所有受害者和群体;建立一套清晰透明的准则,从监管的角度确定非人类实体和概念的后果)。关键词:证券化,战略危机传播理论,规范传播理论,COVID-19传播,大流行传播,斯洛伐克
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信