Pre-Operative IV Iron Infusion for Vascular Patients: Need for More Evidence (Case Series)

A. Nassar, B. Renwick
{"title":"Pre-Operative IV Iron Infusion for Vascular Patients: Need for More Evidence (Case Series)","authors":"A. Nassar, B. Renwick","doi":"10.31031/smoaj.2019.03.000557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pre-operative anaemia is present in approximately 30% of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery [1]. The presence of pre-operative anaemia is the strongest predictor of perioperative blood transfusion and is an independent risk factor for post-operative morbidity and mortality [2]. It is well known that Red Blood Cells (RBC) transfusion can increase the surgical length of stay, increase mortality in surgical patients, and expose patients to the risk of circulatory overload, acute lung injury, and immunosuppression [3-5]. Sufficient data exist to support intravenous iron as efficacious and safe. Intravenous iron should be used as front-line therapy in patients who do not respond to oral iron or are not able to tolerate it, or if surgery is planned for <6 weeks after the diagnosis of iron deficiency [6]. The European Medicines Agency concluded that the benefits of i.v. iron exceed the risks when used appropriately (correct indication and dose), without any difference in safety profile among available formulations [7]. We report two vascular cases had peri-operative i.v iron treatment for anaemia.","PeriodicalId":283483,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Medicine Open Access Journal","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Medicine Open Access Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31031/smoaj.2019.03.000557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pre-operative anaemia is present in approximately 30% of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery [1]. The presence of pre-operative anaemia is the strongest predictor of perioperative blood transfusion and is an independent risk factor for post-operative morbidity and mortality [2]. It is well known that Red Blood Cells (RBC) transfusion can increase the surgical length of stay, increase mortality in surgical patients, and expose patients to the risk of circulatory overload, acute lung injury, and immunosuppression [3-5]. Sufficient data exist to support intravenous iron as efficacious and safe. Intravenous iron should be used as front-line therapy in patients who do not respond to oral iron or are not able to tolerate it, or if surgery is planned for <6 weeks after the diagnosis of iron deficiency [6]. The European Medicines Agency concluded that the benefits of i.v. iron exceed the risks when used appropriately (correct indication and dose), without any difference in safety profile among available formulations [7]. We report two vascular cases had peri-operative i.v iron treatment for anaemia.
血管患者术前静脉输铁:需要更多证据(病例系列)
约30%接受非心脏手术的患者存在术前贫血[1]。术前贫血是围手术期输血的最强预测因子,也是术后发病率和死亡率的独立危险因素[2]。众所周知,红细胞(Red Blood Cells, RBC)输注会增加手术时间,增加手术患者的死亡率,并使患者面临循环超负荷、急性肺损伤和免疫抑制的风险[3-5]。有足够的数据支持静脉注射铁是有效和安全的。对于口服铁无反应或不能耐受的患者,或者在诊断为缺铁后小于6周计划进行手术的患者,应将静脉注射铁作为一线治疗[6]。欧洲药品管理局的结论是,如果使用得当(正确的适应症和剂量),静脉注射铁的益处超过了风险,在现有配方中没有任何安全性差异[7]。我们报告两例血管病例的围手术期静脉注射铁治疗贫血。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信